[GA - PASSED] Death Penalty Ban

Status
Not open for further replies.
It’s a human rights matter. It is most definitely a matter for international law.
Then why aren't bloody dictatorships banned from the first resolution? If human rights were a real hussy then they would have been one of the first resolutions to be aproved.
 
Then why aren't bloody dictatorships banned from the first resolution? If human rights were a real hussy then they would have been one of the first resolutions to be aproved.
How do you suggest defining and banning bloody dictatorships without bumping into all kinds of problems?
 
How do you suggest defining and banning bloody dictatorships without bumping into all kinds of problems?
There is no way. Taht's why I say that supporting this proposal is dumb, since it will generate lots of problems.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There is no way. Taht's why I say that supporting this proposal is dumb, since it will generate lots of problems.
So your reasoning against this legislation is that it violates your national sovereignty and it will generate lots of problems. What problems do you foresee this proposal causing? I have addressed the national sovereignty point several times, so I will not be going over that again.
 
If you refer to this:


It's just that I always get to vote what other people think and for me that is bad, that's another story though. It will not generate problems for me, but to a lot of nations here (I vote for WA as a nation, not as my RL decisions). I think the main problem will be that some nations will leave the WA becouse of this some other could be maybe overpopulation in prisions.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If you refer to this:


It's just that I always get to vote what other people think and for me that is bad, that's another story though. It will not generate problems for me, but to a lot of nations here (I vote for WA as a nation, not as my RL decisions). I think the main problem will be that some nations will leave the WA becouse of this some other could be maybe overpopulation in prisions.
I don't think overpopulation is a concern in this case, but even if it were, I would argue the moral imperative to ensure that we do not violate the sanctity of life overrules the cost of preserving it. I'm not trying to shake you down, but I disagree with your statement. If you choose to vote against, I understand.
 
I don't think overpopulation is a concern in this case, but even if it were, I would argue the moral imperative to ensure that we do not violate the sanctity of life overrules the cost of preserving it. I'm not trying to shake you down, but I disagree with your statement. If you choose to vote against, I understand.
I also understand that you vote for, it's completely fine, countries have different political views. Also as I said there, I voted as a nation, not as my ooc.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top