[GA - PASSED] Patient Travel Freedoms

Status
Not open for further replies.

Westinor

Registered
TNP Nation
Westinor
Discord
Westinor#2315
ga.jpg

Patient Travel Freedoms
Category: Health | Area of Effect: Healthcare
Proposed by: Cretox State | Onsite Topic

The World Assembly,

Noting that adequate and affordable medical care is necessary to ensure the health of individuals and society as a whole,

Understanding that the unique medical needs of individuals can and do vary greatly, as does the medical infrastructure available within any given nation, and

Recognizing that there are occasions in which seeking medical care in a foreign country is in the best interests of an individual, hereby:
  1. Defines a "patient" as a citizen or permanent resident of a member nation seeking medical care within another member nation;
  2. Declares that, subject to this and extant World Assembly resolutions, member nations shall not obstructively interfere with the ability of their patients to seek medical care within the territory of a foreign member nation;
  3. Clarifies that member nations may implement reasonable restrictions on the ability of their patients to seek medical care within the territory of a foreign member nation to the extent necessary to address circumstances where:
    1. seeking medical care within the territory of said nation would present a severe threat to the safety of the patient, excepting potential complications caused by the medical care being sought;
    2. the patient in question is legally unable to make the decision to seek medical care in the territory of said nation due to incarceration, ongoing legal proceedings, or lacking legal competence; or
    3. there exists a compelling public interest similar in nature to the above, which clearly and demonstrably warrants restricting a patient's ability to seek medical care pursuant to this resolution and definitely outweighs the benefits to the patient in allowing such seeking of medical care;
  4. Prohibits member nations from retaliating or taking legal action against a patient for seeking medical care in a foreign member nation, except as necessary to enforce restrictions implemented pursuant to clause 3 of this resolution;
  5. Subject to other World Assembly resolutions, mandates that member nations implement clear and effective policies for providing necessary medical care to their incarcerated populations;
  6. Declares that patients within the territory of a foreign member nation have the right to:
    1. receive appropriate continuing or follow-up medical care upon returning to their member nation of origin, should providing such care not place an undue burden on the healthcare system of that member nation;
    2. receive, to the extent requested by those patients, accurate information concerning all medications prescribed to them, including their ingredients and known side effects; and
    3. be informed of available resources for resolving disputes arising from the medical care in question, including applicable domestic and foreign legal representatives, and to have potential disputes resolved in as timely a manner as can reasonably be provided, and to be made aware of their outcome;
  7. Subject to other World Assembly resolutions and other provisions of this resolution, requires member nations to collect and compile accurate and actionable data concerning their patients' reasons for seeking medical care in a foreign member nation, to such a degree that does not constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, and to use said data to identify and address weaknesses in their domestic healthcare systems; and
  8. Urges member nations to further improve domestic access to medical care.
Note: Only votes from TNP WA nations and NPA personnel will be counted. If you do not meet these requirements, please add (non-WA) or something of that effect to your vote.
Voting Instructions:
  • Vote For if you want the Delegate to vote For the resolution.
  • Vote Against if you want the Delegate to vote Against the resolution.
  • Vote Abstain if you want the Delegate to abstain from voting on this resolution.
  • Vote Present if you are personally abstaining from this vote.
Detailed opinions with your vote are appreciated and encouraged!

[TR][TD] For [/TD][TD] Against [/TD][TD] Abstain [/TD][TD] Present [/TD][/TR][TR][TD]12[/TD][TD]6[/TD][TD]0[/TD][TD]1[/TD][/TR]


IFV
Overview
This proposal aims to provide for the ability of people in member nations to seek medical care within other member nations, with allowance for certain restrictions and exceptions. Additionally, the legislation includes clauses dealing with medical care for incarcerated populations and follow-up care.

Recommendation
While this proposal is inherently limited in scope, it nevertheless legislates on an important area and complements prior resolutions well. The exceptions carved out are reasonable, and while the proposal's ancillary provisions are limited in their specificity, they effectively support the legislation's main objective while leaving room for future legislation.

For these reasons, the Ministry of World Assembly Affairs recommends voting For the at-vote General Assembly proposal, "Patient Travel Freedoms".

Patient Travel Freedoms was passed 12,426 votes to 2,892 (81.1% support).
 
Last edited:
Against.

Clause 1 and 2, in my reading, seem to incentivize medical tourism and freedom of movement, as I remember, was an obstacle to my GAR currently at vote-it caused the radical overhaul to what it is now.

Clause 5 doesn't seem to fit with the overall point of the resolution to protect the rights of people in nations not-native to them to seek and receive medical care.
 
IFV:
Overview
This proposal aims to provide for the ability of people in member nations to seek medical care within other member nations, with allowance for certain restrictions and exceptions. Additionally, the legislation includes clauses dealing with medical care for incarcerated populations and follow-up care.

Recommendation
While this proposal is inherently limited in scope, it nevertheless legislates on an important area and complements prior resolutions well. The exceptions carved out are reasonable, and while the proposal’s ancillary provisions are limited in their specificity, they effectively support the legislation’s main objective while leaving room for future legislation.

For these reasons, the Ministry of World Assembly Affairs recommends voting For the at-vote General Assembly proposal, “Patient Travel Freedoms”.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I finally have access to a computer today! Present.

What on earth about this isn’t covered by previous resolutions, or the future mobility rights one?
Regarding previous resolutions: would you say healthcare in every member nation already meets the needs of every individual citizen? If not, then this resolution covers something new.
Regarding the mobility rights draft: that one is a lot less specific and will be a lot more difficult to pass. Opposing something because there could possibly be a broader one at some point in the future is silly.

Against.

Clause 1 and 2, in my reading, seem to incentivize medical tourism and freedom of movement, as I remember, was an obstacle to my GAR currently at vote-it caused the radical overhaul to what it is now.
No, the problem with your original proposal was that it granted a ridiculous degree of freedom of movement predicated solely on religious beliefs.

Clause 5 doesn't seem to fit with the overall point of the resolution to protect the rights of people in nations not-native to them to seek and receive medical care.
Incarcerated people may be subject to restrictions in their right to travel for medical care under this proposal. That clause is intended to cover that area in a way that doesn't contradict prior legislation or block future legislation.

Against, I think a resolution with a broader scope would be more appropriate for such a matter.
Healthcare is a right. Or at least, it should be. My intention with this proposal is to ensure that, in combination with prior legislation, people have that right.
 
Last edited:
Regarding previous resolutions: would you say healthcare in every member nation already meets the needs of every individual citizen? If not, then this resolution covers something new.
Regarding the mobility rights draft: that one is a lot less specific and will be a lot more difficult to pass. Opposing something because there could possibly be a broader one at some point in the future is silly.
The first bit is new, but then if you passed the mobility rights one, it'd be redundant, and I'd rather we don't pass redundant legislation. Also, I do not believe one bit that mobility rights would get any less than a 70% FOR margin. Don't take the easy way out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top