I didn't care much about this whole debate, and voted for the previous bill by Praetor because I thought it was reasonable. I was even somewhat inclined to agree with Security Councillors who said that past Security Councillors made private comments with the expectation that they will not be released, so we should be more cautious about releasing them without their consent. But then I thought about our current Freedom of Information Act. At the time it was written, were there not people who had been part of the Cabinet but had left when the bill was passed? If it wasn't and isn't a concern for Cabinet members, why is it a concern for Security Council members? Wouldn't both have made comments with the expectation of privacy? If there's no regional security threat to their comments being released, why shouldn't it be? Seems like much ado about nothing.