- TNP Nation
- sil_dorsett
- Discord
- sildorsett
The best strategy is to encourage residents of TNP to endorse one another! Having a large portion of our community maintaining high endorsement counts increases regional influence and makes it quite difficult for rogue forces to maintain the gameside delegacy. The WADP is quite effective at promoting endotarting through all of its moving pieces (i.e. monthly and yearly awards, Keeper of the North recognition, card giveaways, endorsement alerts, etc.). Good supplemental components to this program are government sponsored events like the Endorsement Frenzy last December and TNP for #1 two years back. Hopefully we can get another one of these going soon.What do you consider the best strategy in keeping security?
Well, the offspring of a mama sloth and papa sloth aren't going to be giraffes!y r u a sloth lol
A flat argument as well.Flatly opposed.
I am certain you have straw manned my position good Minister. One does not have to be a part of VC or the real life channel to be a part of the community. However, one does have to give time to engaging and being substantially present with others. That is what servants do, and that is what The North Pacific deserves. I understand you wish to protect your political protege regardless of any opposition, but some of us have true concerns about who it is we are to confirm to the Security Council.I was simply delighted to see Siwale apply to the Security Council and pleased to see this application finally presented to the Security Council.
Siwale was a fantastic Vice Delegate that took the Security Council to new heights of endorsements, programs and activity. He likewise was a fantastic Delegate and colleague to work with. I believe that he will make the Security Council, which has sometimes in the past been seen as stale and somewhat inactive, a much stronger institution. I am certain in my view that he can be trusted with our regional security. He has been before, as our Delegate and Vice Delegate. On neither occasion did he falter or let us down.
It is far better to have Siwale inside the halls of the Security Council than to lock him out because the zealous pews feel entitled to hear him speak on Voice Chat or in the #real-life channel. You don't have to know the facets of his real life personality to be sure he will serve with distinction when it comes to protecting our regional security.
I have to agree with McM. Siwale can be trusted with regional security. His merit should matter, not his idelogical beliefs.I was simply delighted to see Siwale apply to the Security Council and pleased to see this application finally presented to the Security Council.
Siwale was a fantastic Vice Delegate that took the Security Council to new heights of endorsements, programs and activity. He likewise was a fantastic Delegate and colleague to work with. I believe that he will make the Security Council, which has sometimes in the past been seen as stale and somewhat inactive, a much stronger institution. I am certain in my view that he can be trusted with our regional security. He has been before, as our Delegate and Vice Delegate. On neither occasion did he falter or let us down.
It is far better to have Siwale inside the halls of the Security Council than to lock him out because the zealous pews feel entitled to hear him speak on Voice Chat or in the #real-life channel. You don't have to know the facets of his real life personality to be sure he will serve with distinction when it comes to protecting our regional security.
Am I ask why?Flatly opposed.
I am certain you have straw manned my position good Minister. One does not have to be a part of VC or the real life channel to be a part of the community. However, one does have to give time to engaging and being substantially present with others. That is what servants do, and that is what The North Pacific deserves. I understand you wish to protect your political protege regardless of any opposition, but some of us have true concerns about who it is we are to confirm to the Security Council.
You protect him vehemently as if you have some investment, that is what I gather. Regardless this is not petty. I know we would all like to just say that he would be good at the job, but I am here to say that being good at a job is not all that there is. There is the person behind the manager or job and that is vital to understand as well. You keep attacking me as if I have committed a crime when I am sincerely doing this for the good of this region.Ah, the desiccated coconut is under pressure so is utilising anything he can his hands on. This does remind me of the time Siwale asserted that Artemis was my BFF. Perhaps you two are cut from the same cloth after all. Given that Siwale was the first and only individual to defeat me in an election, and I subsequently served as his Minister, I am unsure exactly how he can be my protege.
In any event, almost certainly, by serving as Vice Delegate and as our Delegate, Siwale has clearly engaged and been substantially present in this community. It would have been impossible for him to win such a hot contest in the first place had he not done so. Siwale logs into the forum daily, he tarts regularly and engages with nations in-game. Ultimately your questions of engagement clearly relate to one platform - discord. Where Siwale is a moderator and regularly available. Even if he does not engage with you on a personal level.
As I said to you when you tried to lobby me to oppose this application, I will not be, and I hope the assembly will not be mired in petty personality squabbles such as this. You have not said what these "true concerns" are. As it stands, your position quite is quite clearly that you're upset that Siwale does not engage with you about personal matters and as such you don't "know" him.
I have almost always been above a number of members of the Security Council in endorsements. Back in early 2017 (prior to becoming Vice Delegate), I was the 3rd most endorsed nation in TNP. My philosophy has always been to maximize the amount of influence I could bring to the region through both giving as many endorsements as possible and receiving as many as possible (within reason of course).A few months back Siwale went on an endorsement spree and managed to surpass a few Security Council members. This does show a degree of disregard for the measures put in place to ensure regional security.
My questions for Siwale are thus...
Why did you attempt to endorse target to the degree that you began to infringe on the endo-numbers of the Security Council?
How would you say you've learned from the experience in regards to what's expected of you as a Security Councillor?
I thank Highton for his boldness and candidness. I feel there are many who share Highton's viewpoint, but many fear to oppose because of their own status or place in the region. I hoped that my speaking out would show others that it is indeed right and ok to be open as well.With regards to Siwale, he has been a respected member of the TNP community for some time. I am grateful to him for appointing me to my first government position. That said, taking into consideration recent events which I am sure I do not need to specify here, I cannot in good conscious support the ascension of Siwale to the esteemed role of security councilor. I thank him for his service as delegate and in the other positions he has held, but do not believe that he should fill this position.
You protect him vehemently as if you have some investment, that is what I gather. Regardless this is not petty. I know we would all like to just say that he would be good at the job, but I am here to say that being good at a job is not all that there is. There is the person behind the manager or job and that is vital to understand as well. You keep attacking me as if I have committed a crime when I am sincerely doing this for the good of this region.
Is giving up 371,125 influence points from someone who has proven their trustworthiness through 2 VD terms and 2 WAD terms really what's best for the region? I wanted Siwale on the SC right after his term as delegate ended, but from what I understand there were other things that stood in the way of that.I am sincerely doing this for the good of this region.
I think my only concern there is what would happen if the Serving Delegate suddenly vanished and the Vice Delegate became the WA Delegate for a time and had someone 1 endorsement away from having the position illegitimately. Regardless of the fact that you (Siwale) are the closest one to that scenario as one currently not in the SC, if anyone was in that position and they weren't an SCer, as an SCer what action would you take to bring the situation under control?I don’t agree with these laws being used to try and define endorsement cap stricter than one endorsement less than the Vice Delegate.
What if the Delegate vanishes or otherwise needs to abdicate? Wouldn't someone right on the heels of the VD, or even ahead of them in endorsement count, pose a threat to the peaceful and lawful transfer of power?I don’t agree with these laws being used to try and define endorsement cap stricter than one endorsement less than the Vice Delegate.
I think we can begin with this response. Siwale indeed has significant skill when it comes to obtaining and maintaining his impressive endorsement count. However, it is the job of the Security Council to protect the region from rampant endorsement accumulation, and yet Siwale seems unconcerned that someone as high as himself sits currently fifth and above Security Councilors. Would Siwale then take a similar position if a newcomer rose to such a significant endorsement count as well? I don't see a sense of urgency when it comes to Siwale's since of regional security. It is almost as if since it is he who is in this position it does not matter.I have almost always been above a number of members of the Security Council in endorsements. Back in early 2017 (prior to becoming Vice Delegate), I was the 3rd most endorsed nation in TNP. My philosophy has always been to maximize the amount of influence I could bring to the region through both giving as many endorsements as possible and receiving as many as possible (within reason of course).
I don’t think maintaining a high endorsement count is a bad thing. It promotes cross-endotarting, draws new players to the region, and bolsters regional influence. After all, we are a region that stands out from the rest in regards to our love for endorsements. Endorsement gathering typically only because a real security threat when an individual surpasses the count of the sitting Vice Delegate.
I often see laws on reckless endorsement gathering being referenced to discourage endotarters from maximizing their tarting efforts. I think it is important to note that these laws exist to provide the Delegate with the legal framework for gameside ejections if the need arises due to a confirmed security threat. I don’t agree with these laws being used to try and define endorsement cap stricter than one endorsement less than the Vice Delegate.
There are a number of efforts which could be implemented rather rapidly to ensure the Vice Delegate secures the in-game Delegacy at the next update. Through collaborative efforts with the rest of the SC and other branches of government, we could deploy the NPA to TNP, run a small temporary unendorsement campaign on the non-SC nation, call in support from our allies, and maintain an active presence on the RMB, forum and Discord to ensure nations are kept up-to-date on the transition.I think my only concern there is what would happen if the Serving Delegate suddenly vanished and the Vice Delegate became the WA Delegate for a time and had someone 1 endorsement away from having the position illegitimately. Regardless of the fact that you (Siwale) are the closest one to that scenario as one currently not in the SC, if anyone was in that position and they weren't an SCer, as an SCer what action would you take to bring the situation under control?
As long as a nation isn’t ahead of the Vice Delegate in endorsements, the transfer of the in-game Delegacy would still go through. Additionally, we could employ some of the methods listed above to ensure this gap remains sufficient between the Vice Delegate and non-SC nation.What if the Delegate vanishes or otherwise needs to abdicate? Wouldn't someone right on the heels of the VD, or even ahead of them in endorsement count, pose a threat to the peaceful and lawful transfer of power?
No... being good at the job IS ALL THERE IS. TNP does not care about the person as long as they support TNP and put TNP interests first when they act in TNP. That is the beauty of the region.You protect him vehemently as if you have some investment, that is what I gather. Regardless this is not petty. I know we would all like to just say that he would be good at the job, but I am here to say that being good at a job is not all that there is. There is the person behind the manager or job and that is vital to understand as well. You keep attacking me as if I have committed a crime when I am sincerely doing this for the good of this region.
Having been a person, not serving on the Security Council, who has held high endorsement levels in the past, when we didn't even have RO's to protect TNP, trust is paramount. So no... I doubt that anyone would suggest that a newcomer would receive the same treatment as Siwale when it came to high endo counts. He has been delegate. If he wanted to screw us over, he had a much better chance than where he is now, whether he is SC or not.I think we can begin with this response. Siwale indeed has significant skill when it comes to obtaining and maintaining his impressive endorsement count. However, it is the job of the Security Council to protect the region from rampant endorsement accumulation, and yet Siwale seems unconcerned that someone as high as himself sits currently fifth and above Security Councilors. Would Siwale then take a similar position if a newcomer rose to such a significant endorsement count as well? I don't see a sense of urgency when it comes to Siwale's since of regional security. It is almost as if since it is he who is in this position it does not matter.
My history of interaction with you is different from my interaction history with Siwale. He held many public offices that showcased his behavior which brought it to my attention.I probably engage with the community less than Siwale does, and my SC nomination did not face any significant opposition. Is there a double standard being applied here?
Has COE not hold many, if not more positions than Siwale.My history of interaction with you is different from my interaction history with Siwale. He held many public offices that showcased his behavior which brought it to my attention.