CD- betterThanFlash
Waffle maker
- TNP Nation
- Eywaan
- Discord
- CD-yourprivatecompactdisc#1432
Can someone explain what statement 12 means?
Onsite Authority Enhancement Bill
- Thread starter Pallaith
- Start date
- Discord
- COE#7110
Basically, the on-site ban can't last longer than the forum ban. So if the forum admin team bans someone until, say, May 15th, the delegate can't use that to justify an on-site ban past that date. If the admin team bans for a year, the delegate can't them indefinitely. Etc.
I'll have a response for Pallaith sometime later. No time right now.
I would support this bill if a particular vaguery was gotten rid of.
'Violators of NationStates rules' could mean most people. Gravedig is a violation of nationstates rules. So is having a signature longer than 8 lines. I feel that, although this is obviously not the intention, this could have the unintended effect of giving a future delegate freedom to eject if they can point to a minor rules violation. This text requires altering.
'Violators of NationStates rules' could mean most people. Gravedig is a violation of nationstates rules. So is having a signature longer than 8 lines. I feel that, although this is obviously not the intention, this could have the unintended effect of giving a future delegate freedom to eject if they can point to a minor rules violation. This text requires altering.
That part is actually existing law, it was included to show the endpoint of my new language and where the existing law continues. It also wouldn't work the way you stated, because that clause is concerned with conduct on the RMB, and the examples you cited are forum actions. People in TNP couldn't violate those rules where we would have jurisdiction over them, and they literally cannot occur on the RMB.