Results: March 2018 Judicial Election

Results: March 2018 Judicial Election

ec_seal.png

The Election Commission has counted the votes in this judicial election and now publishes these results, attesting they are true and correct. A detailed breakdown of votes and results can be found in this spreadsheet.

Candidates [c] Votes [c] Elected [c] Zyvetskistaahn [c] 47 [c] Yes [c] Scorch [c] 45 [c] Yes [c] Lord Lore [c] 33 [c] Yes [c]BMWSurfer[c]30[c]No[c]Clean Land[c]6[c]No[c]Abstain[c]43[c]

  1. Malta Comino Gozo's ballot was discounted because they were not a citizen.
  2. Private ballot #1266 was counted, even though they selected three candidates and an abstention. An election commissioner challenged the ballot, submitting that it should be discounted because the voter made more than three selections, and their intent is ambiguous. The challenge was rejected on the grounds that abstain is not a candidate, and therefore the ballot is legal because they did not select more than three candidates.

Election Commissioners: Darcania and Crushing Our Enemies
 
Congratulations Zyvetskistaahn, Scorch, and Lord Lore on your election!

To those who didn't win: all of you ran great campaigns this time and definitely have the necessary experience to serve as Justices and you have a strong chance of being elected next time.

Keep working, building your experience, and participating in new areas of government!
 
Back
Top