Makes sense considering the Delegate and Vice Delegate are the 2 most important gov't positions. The spoiler effect (vote splitting) may come into play in a plurality vote with multiple candidates (more than 2). A majority ensures those positions must receive more than half of the votes cast. I certainly wouldn't want a Delegate or Vice Delegate be elected after receiving only 25% of the votes cast. Runoffs may be annoying to some, but I'm ok with it.quak1234:I was just wondering, why do we elect the Delegate and Vice Delegate by majority vote, but then elect the Speaker and Court Justices by plurality vote? I know it says that is how it shall be done in the Constitution, but why was it made that way?
Shhh!flemingovia:BEcause certain people in TNP like complicated voting systems (mentioning no turtles).
Nierr:Hell, I wanted a proportional system and even I voted no on av
r3naissanc3r:I think it'd make sense to switch the Speaker and AG elections to majority vote as well, for reasons of uniformity.
Justice elections are more complex, as we elect three of them simultaneously.
Maybe in your dreamsGradea:It is not the Eluarchy but the Gradeaocracy.
?
I can think of two ways!mcmasterdonia:Nierr:Hell, I wanted a proportional system and even I voted no on av
Out of curiosity, how would proportional voting work in this system?
r3naissanc3r:I think it'd make sense to switch the Speaker and AG elections to majority vote as well, for reasons of uniformity.
Justice elections are more complex, as we elect three of them simultaneously.
Del and VD are seen as more important than the other roles. I tend to agree.quak1234:Hello.
I was just wondering, why do we elect the Delegate and Vice Delegate by majority vote, but then elect the Speaker and Court Justices by plurality vote? I know it says that is how it shall be done in the Constitution, but why was it made that way?
Thank you.