falapatorius
TNPer
Seeing that Flem's R4R on EC conduct during the most recent Judicial Election has raised some issues with Court procedure, I'd like to start a discussion thread (so as not to hijack a thread designated for Court operations).
Two issues have thus far been raised:
1. Should all the Justices have recused themselves from this proceeding?
2. Is the current R4R template necessary? (keep in mind the Court is allowed to change the ACR's as they see fit)
1. I believe all Justices should have recused themselves and allowed the Delegate to choose THOs. At the very least, to avoid the appearance of impropriety. Any decision reached by the Court could be perceived as biased/self-serving.
2. I'm not a fan of the current R4R template, but it's not an onerous obligation, just an inconvenient one. A bit cookie-cutterish perhaps, but time saving I guess. Some ppl do like to ramble.
Two issues have thus far been raised:
1. Should all the Justices have recused themselves from this proceeding?
2. Is the current R4R template necessary? (keep in mind the Court is allowed to change the ACR's as they see fit)
1. I believe all Justices should have recused themselves and allowed the Delegate to choose THOs. At the very least, to avoid the appearance of impropriety. Any decision reached by the Court could be perceived as biased/self-serving.
2. I'm not a fan of the current R4R template, but it's not an onerous obligation, just an inconvenient one. A bit cookie-cutterish perhaps, but time saving I guess. Some ppl do like to ramble.