Malvad:
To the most honorable member state of McMasterdonia,
The Chair would like to clarify some points the member may have missed.
- This discussion was opened to hear the opinions of other member states. The "vote" is simply an opinion poll. The Chair apologizes if this was misleading in any way. Debate can still take place and the nation of McMasterdonia has every right to defend itself against these accusations.
The chair has implied that this is a vote of the Union. If it is just an opinion poll, will a proper vote be moved by the Chair to ascertain the Democratic Unions collective response to this so called crisis?
[*]We are not limiting your national sovereignty by discussing what is happening around the region. International events should concern an international organization such as the Democratic Union, especially if it concerns a member state.
[*]Your world tour collapsed due to internal issues and none of the nations involved were informed. This may show a great deal of internal stress.
You can also see that many Nations while initially supportive of the tour, were unresponsive when the dates for their visits approached. The internal issues were one reason for the collapse of the tour, which has been acknowledged by HM's government.
[*]McMasterdonian News has a subtitle that states: "Government Approved News From McMasterdonia" and has had articles removed and edited by the government. The news appears to be very government oriented.
That is not a rational argument, with all due respect. If any citizen of Malvad was to produce a national newspaper that was distributed internationally through secure internet services with the subtitle "Official Malvadian news", would the Malvadian government accept that all of the news from that service is the view of the legitimate government? Would Malvad expected other nations to believe everything that is reported in that newspaper.
[*]The legitimacy of the queen and the rebels is very hazy currently. The queen, possibly illegally, interfered with the elected government which led to some believing the were wrongfully disenfranchised, sparking rebellion. There were also no reports of the electoral centre being destroyed.
The legitimacy of the Queen is not in question. I refer you to the McMasterdonian
constitution. Specifically, all government power is invested in the Queen, who also retains the right to enact royal decree to overturn the constitution. This power is exercised with great restraint and has not been used for some years. The constitution was enacted by Queen Issabella in 1975. Your insinuation that the Queen is illegitimate is both factually wrong and demonstrates that the Chair has not fully researched the legality of the Queen's positions or actions in the Kingdom.
The electoral centre issue was not widely reported due to its distressing nature. A simple inquiry from the chair would have provided the answer that he seeks. We can provide images and detailed reports of the damage to the building. I will point out that you completely ignored the other issues I have raised on holding elections right now.
Furthermore this is grossly insulting to Her Majesty and her government. That the chair would even remotely entertain the possibility that our rightful monarch and head of state is illegitimate is extremely insulting.
[*]Ratings systems due not always show reality, as proven with many different nations.
I was merely pointing out that the Kingdom is fully compliant with all of the Democratic Unions requirements. If we were to reapply for membership tomorrow, you would be obligated to accept our membership.
[*]The Democratic Union's purpose is to promote peace and freedom. That is your constitutional legitimacy.
That may be the case, however the constitution strictly prohibits laws that damage national sovereignty. It is clear to the Kingdom that the Chair is making an exception to prosecute their biased agenda against the Kingdom.
[*]The Malvadian government can view a nation however it wishes. Currently it has a very unfavorable view on a country that would insult its views and history. The last Czar of Malvad, Czar Godric I was killed by Admiral Ronald Vicci, who staged a coup against Malvad's legitimate government in 2013. Vicci was eventually overthrown. The Czar's wife, Amelia, was made Empress and regent with their daughter, Hannah, serving as Czarina. The Czarina and the Empress voluntarily relinquished their power that same year so as to create a full democracy. The Czarina is currently missing after Ronald Vicci once again seized power. Malvad has returned to democracy after the Free Malvad Revolution. We are still searching for the royal family. Your lack of knowledge and sympathy for our history has stunned and insulted Malvad.
Information from Malvad on these so called revolutions has been unclear and sporadic. The disappearence of the Royal Family is certainly questionable, as are the constant coups of a nation who claims to lead the Democratic Union as it's chairman. I present the view that Malvad has become a hardcore republican nation that rejects the notion of constitutional monarchy as a valid form of national democracy. The relations between Malvad and Mcmasterdonia have soured, because the Chairman has failed to communicate with the Kingdom on these internal matters. He has instead chosen to execute a political assassination of her Majesty the Queen and the standing of the Kingdom within the halls of the Democratic Union.
[/list]
This discussion will not be tabled.
Your authoritarian approach to this debate is noted.