Fraud Complaint

Unibot: As you noted in my other complaint thread:

I do believe that Law 22, Section 4 (Enumeration of Prohibited Acts : Election Fraud) of the legal code could be used to persecute someone for "willfully deceiving" residents of The North Pacific in the context of an election which would act as a "defamation" law of sorts.

Click to expand...

I wish to file a complaint of fraud for willfully deceiving the residents if the North Pacific:

To wit, the SC has claimed more that 48 hours ago to present a report as to why they claim I am a 'threat to the security of the region'. Such a report has not been produced and therefore an attempt to deceive (by using such a threat to issue a report and not producing) is also defamatory in the event that I should run for office in the future (which I fully intend to do).

I request that the AG order to produce their 'report' withing 24 hours of this post with all proof supporting that report or immediately apologize for making defamatory statements.

R

The Security Council failed to move as swiftly as one of its members expected. Such is life.

I'm not certain what that promise of a report would have to do with election fraud, but I'll draw the assistant Attorney General for prosecuting the Security Council to review this

I believe that law might be more applicable to Blue Wolf II's near total absence (although announced) and his failure to complete the transition.
Will the AG consider this a complaint as to Blue Wolf?

Grosseschnauzer:

I believe that law might be more applicable to Blue Wolf II's near total absence (although announced) and his failure to complete the transition.
Will the AG consider this a complaint as to Blue Wolf?

Click to expand...

The Attorney General's office would say that the complainant would almost certainly be better suited by a recall petition.

Take this with a grain of salt - this is a demonstrative complaint that seems to have gotten a good reaction, that being activity.

But I still see no 'supporting proof' contained in the 10 line report issued by the SC. Only opinion and innuendo. ;D

Unibot tends to label those who disagrees with him as a security threat when he's proven wrong and then makes libellous and defamatory accusations against them that he can't prove.

Your accusation against you Romanoffia in my view, is baseless.

Govindia:

Unibot tends to label those who disagrees with him as a security threat ....

Click to expand...

You've continually disrespected my officers even after I've specifically asked you to refrain from doing so and have a history of serious sexual harassment allegations that could compromise the safe environment I've tried to provide for our female officers. Your only defence so far against these allegations has been to dishonour and speak lowly of the supposed victims; that is insufficient grounds for changing my mind on the matter, to say the very least. There's the door *points*, get the fuck out of here. Thank you for reading.

Click to expand...

^ I didn't call you a security threat, Gov.

EDIT: Elu notes 'you compromise the "safe" environment'..

You still mention "safe" there

unibot:

Govindia:

Unibot tends to label those who disagrees with him as a security threat ....

Click to expand...

You've continually disrespected my officers even after I've specifically asked you to refrain from doing so and have a history of serious sexual harassment allegations that could compromise the safe environment I've tried to provide for our female officers. Your only defence so far against these allegations has been to dishonour and speak lowly of the supposed victims; that is insufficient grounds for changing my mind on the matter, to say the very least. There's the door *points*, get the fuck out of here. Thank you for reading.

Click to expand...

^ I didn't call you a security threat, Gov.

EDIT: Elu notes 'you compromise the "safe" environment'..

Click to expand...

Actually you did for BS reasons in Balder, and you still were proven wrong by Fotar and others.

Govindia:

unibot:

Govindia:

Unibot tends to label those who disagrees with him as a security threat ....

Click to expand...

You've continually disrespected my officers even after I've specifically asked you to refrain from doing so and have a history of serious sexual harassment allegations that could compromise the safe environment I've tried to provide for our female officers. Your only defence so far against these allegations has been to dishonour and speak lowly of the supposed victims; that is insufficient grounds for changing my mind on the matter, to say the very least. There's the door *points*, get the fuck out of here. Thank you for reading.

Click to expand...

^ I didn't call you a security threat, Gov.

EDIT: Elu notes 'you compromise the "safe" environment'..

Click to expand...

Actually you did for BS reasons in Balder, and you still were proven wrong by Fotar and others.

Click to expand...

Your comments are out of place.

Oh, poo. This thread isn't fun anymore and it has already served its purposes. ;D

I withdraw the complaint now that the elected Delegate has returned.