I followed the instructions about the ballot that appeared in the first post of the voting thread. I did not change my ballot because Pasargad's status seemed unclear and I wanted my vote to be of record in cast it turned out he was a valid nominee either by the Election Commissioner or the Court. And for the record, if Pasargad wasn't considered a candidate for whatever reason, then my vote in that Race should be considered an abstention and shouldn't be counted in that race.
As Law 26 currently says
"Absentions" are not votes for or against any candidate, and may not be used to determine the results of any election. They may be used to signify a voter's presence for quorum, activity, or other purposes.
People need to be very careful in looking at past elections -- an amendment was passed to the election law and as a Regional Assembly Rule about abstentions in February of 2009. These changes overruled a Court decision from 2006 about counting abstentions in the R.A.
You may quote this PM and post it if you like.
GS