There used to be some gameplay restrictions that the mod placed on delegate wars, in the form of curtailing banjections. These restrictions have since been replaced by influence, giving rise to a kind of "do whatever you can get away with" philosophy.
In my opinion this climate has spread from the regional control to the WFE and RMB, and thence to the offsite fora, in a certain decrease of etiquette. The terms of service of our board host are still in effect, but not very effective in limiting the abuse.
This is a disturbing development. As a political game, I would enjoy playing this far more if we were playing our outrage and condemnation, rather than hating the guts of people in real life. This is a very expansive roleplay, on multiple, complex layers - multiple characters playing other characters, alliances, secret conversations, public conversations on multiple media - but it is a game.
Perhaps if we followed a certain code of conduct, the game would be more fun and less frustrating?
Please discuss.
In my opinion this climate has spread from the regional control to the WFE and RMB, and thence to the offsite fora, in a certain decrease of etiquette. The terms of service of our board host are still in effect, but not very effective in limiting the abuse.
This is a disturbing development. As a political game, I would enjoy playing this far more if we were playing our outrage and condemnation, rather than hating the guts of people in real life. This is a very expansive roleplay, on multiple, complex layers - multiple characters playing other characters, alliances, secret conversations, public conversations on multiple media - but it is a game.
Perhaps if we followed a certain code of conduct, the game would be more fun and less frustrating?
Please discuss.