Outer Kharkistania
TNPer
I propose to remove the Sedition clause from the Legal Code because, frankly, many TNP members including myself, JAL, and others could technically be considered of sedition since the law was so vague.
As you can see, "revolt" is not well defined, and if the government had not been so inactive, all our publicity stunts to show that the government was inactive could have been considered sedition. In addition, a particularly authoritarian government could use this clause to clamp down on any criticism of the TNP government.
Section 3: Sedition
A - "Sedition" is defined as an intentional attempt on the official forums or within the NationStates region "The North Pacific" to incite the Nations of The North Pacific to revolt in a manner not sanctioned by the Constitution.
As you can see, "revolt" is not well defined, and if the government had not been so inactive, all our publicity stunts to show that the government was inactive could have been considered sedition. In addition, a particularly authoritarian government could use this clause to clamp down on any criticism of the TNP government.