Unterwasserseestaat
TNPer
Ahoy All,
Given my recent positions as Vice Delegate and Interim Delegate I'm in an excellent position to offer advice to and/or commiserate with next term's Delegate about endotarts being pains in the ass, or staying up through update because you said you'd give 24 hours' notice before ejecting.
I feel that, with the more widely available technology to gauge the state of the region, we should continue moving to make the number of endorsements given as the benchmark for security concern, as that more clearly shows the intent of nations in The North Pacific. Some endotarts are individuals with time on their hands, some represent hostile threats attempting to usurp the Delegacy, but there is only one tool to deal with any determined threat: ejection from the region.
Though this is the issue that mainly comes up before the Security Council, the Council is a general-use tool for things we take to be urgent threats. Often times this can give us a clear choice of action, though it is not written into the Constitution. Other times this means playing things by ear and trying to keep as much as the spirit of the Constitution in the Council's rulings. This is compounded by the vagueness of the idea of emergency.
To make sure that we continue to have a transparent system of government, I would use the postition on the Council to push for specific rulings, to make any precedents set down can give clear guidelines to government officials' actions in similar situations in the future.
My dealing with the endotarts during the transition:
http://z13.invisionfree.invalid/TNP/index.php?showtopic=1875
Here I am dynamically interacting with the SC:
http://z13.invisionfree.invalid/TNP/index.php?showtopic=1879
Given my recent positions as Vice Delegate and Interim Delegate I'm in an excellent position to offer advice to and/or commiserate with next term's Delegate about endotarts being pains in the ass, or staying up through update because you said you'd give 24 hours' notice before ejecting.
I feel that, with the more widely available technology to gauge the state of the region, we should continue moving to make the number of endorsements given as the benchmark for security concern, as that more clearly shows the intent of nations in The North Pacific. Some endotarts are individuals with time on their hands, some represent hostile threats attempting to usurp the Delegacy, but there is only one tool to deal with any determined threat: ejection from the region.
Though this is the issue that mainly comes up before the Security Council, the Council is a general-use tool for things we take to be urgent threats. Often times this can give us a clear choice of action, though it is not written into the Constitution. Other times this means playing things by ear and trying to keep as much as the spirit of the Constitution in the Council's rulings. This is compounded by the vagueness of the idea of emergency.
To make sure that we continue to have a transparent system of government, I would use the postition on the Council to push for specific rulings, to make any precedents set down can give clear guidelines to government officials' actions in similar situations in the future.
My dealing with the endotarts during the transition:
http://z13.invisionfree.invalid/TNP/index.php?showtopic=1875
Here I am dynamically interacting with the SC:
http://z13.invisionfree.invalid/TNP/index.php?showtopic=1879
