K koona TNPer Feb 6, 2006 #41 The only activity clauses I could see is for voting. If an RA member doesn't vote for at least two consecutive votes (or something like that) that's a clear sign of inactvity. Other than that I support the merger.
The only activity clauses I could see is for voting. If an RA member doesn't vote for at least two consecutive votes (or something like that) that's a clear sign of inactvity. Other than that I support the merger.
W wizardofoz01 TNPer Feb 9, 2006 #42 Just a note that since the elections are now over, people are still free to debate this proposal before its scheduled vote on the 21st.
Just a note that since the elections are now over, people are still free to debate this proposal before its scheduled vote on the 21st.
W wizardofoz01 TNPer Feb 22, 2006 #43 This proposal will now go to a Cabinet vote. EDIT: Topic closed.
W wizardofoz01 TNPer Feb 23, 2006 #44 As of this moment, I have sent the proposal to Flem for Cabinet consideration. As a reminder, they have 15 days to vote on it before it comes back here.
As of this moment, I have sent the proposal to Flem for Cabinet consideration. As a reminder, they have 15 days to vote on it before it comes back here.
