Right....I am wondering if ^ has some motive for trying to convince < that the whereabouts of ^^^^^'s holiday destination is something that < should not show curiosity about.....And I am wondering why....
I am beginning to worry as to the level of ^'s confusedness...as <'s level of being confused is in fact relative to ^'s confusedeyness...so I sincerely hope ^ is merely bluffing as to the level of ^'s being confused....for <'s sake anyway...
I am very tempted to reply to an email I got from a Professor here about joining some sort of Greenpeace semester program. "No thanks, I don't support terrorists, domestic or foreign."