Search results

Justice: 1. < Abstain > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

Congratulations @Attempted Socialism

Support.

100% agree here. My pov is that free speech should only be infringed when there is a clear harm - fraud, perjury etc. Getting a campaign DM is definitely annoying but it’s hardly a harm in the legal sense. Definitely do not support criminalising this behaviour.

Delegate: < Chipoli > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No > Vice Delegate: < Simone > Would you like to reopen nominations? < Yes > Speaker: < Matzerati > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

Happy to support

Speaker: 1. < Abstain > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

Court Justice: 1. < Abstain > 2. < Abstain > 3. < Abstain > 4. < Abstain > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

Can I ask the Speaker why we've had truncated votes lately? A military exemption vote that lasted 3 days, and latterly two confirmation votes that only lasted 4 days (down from the usual 5). I don't generally miss votes even though I'm only able to log on once a week, but I've missed two now...

Support.

I would agree with some of the other posters - just because we're not using it now doesn't mean it should be removed from the law books when, if it arises in the future, we'd just have to put it back in again. To me, this seems more of a kneejerk response against The Wellspring in particular...

Delegate: 1. <Picairn> 2. <Pallaith > 3. <Dreadton> 4. <Blue Wolf II>

Delegate: < Abstain > Would you like to reopen nominations? < Yes > Vice Delegate: < Sil Dorsett > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No > Speaker: < Abstain > Would you like to reopen nominations? < Yes >

I second the nomination of @Simone for Delegate

Weird, my laptop tells me it is July, not April.

Court Justice: 1. < Abstain > Would you like to reopen nominations? < Yes >

Court Justice: 1. < Abstain > Would you like to reopen nominations? < Yes >

Delegate:1. < Abstain > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No > Vice Delegate: < Abstain > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No > Speaker:1. < Abstain > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

Court Justice: 1. < Abstain > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

It's a No from me, fam.

I'm not sold on RA Commendations, no matter how deserving the nominee.

I don't like what Gor did towards the end of his Delegacy, but those were legal, political acts. I don't think he'd put the region's security at risk and even the SC has said they don't doubt his commitment to the region. They're rejecting him because they don't like how he played politics...

Delegate: 1. < Abstain > Would you like to reopen nominations? < Yes > Vice Delegate: < Abstain > Would you like to reopen nominations? < Yes > Speaker: < Abstain > Would you like to reopen nominations? < Yes >

When the IDU, one of TNP's oldest relationships, was raided by TNP's war adversaries, because of the region's gameside embassy and treatied alliance with TNP, you did not reach out - not to apologise for the inconvenience, or even to see if the IDU needed help. The region has been passworded...

This seems very vague. If you could draft a specific bill/amendment so that we could more easily visualise the changes you suggest and how it'd impact our current approach, that would be better.

Best of luck LD

Support.

I support this. Former Vice Delegate and acting Delegate and the Security Council support his application.

Court Justice: 1. < Abstain > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

I can support this.