Search results

Well, as some of you may or may not have noticed, I dropped off the face of the Earth for some time. My nations (here and in Stars) CTE'd, I'm honestly kinda surprised that I still have GMOD status, and yet it appears life did not end in TNP. This is a very good thing indeed. I do not intend...

My test message to myself worked, and I didn't even go blind.

TNP Nation update - Punisher Minifigs should be considered my resident nation, for all intents and purposes.

Nope. However, w00t!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :worship:

GBM.

I will be away for a while. It is delicious. I will be back later. Kthxbai.

Nopes. Heft?

Negative, Ghost Rider. Playing to lose - TNP's ODB - OPA. ---------------- Now playing: Old Dirty Bastard - Shimmy Shimmy Ya

That was not, in fact, the topic I was expecting from the title, Grosse. But congrats anyway! Have a kibble on me, little one.

:eyebrow:

I am fundamentally excited in a very real and potentially-inappropriate way about the possibilities the current election brings.

I shall not be standing for re-election; the judicial process does, in fact, need some tweaking, and it bugs me to introduce legislation to address such while sitting as a Justice. However, I would like to endorse Grosse and GM.

If it involves that costume, I have a suggestion . . . Heyo!

Actually, I would argue that it is impossible to construe part of the Constitution/Legal Code in such a manner as to compel someone to violate another part. But that's how I roll.

I thought I was your enemy. :no:

And an absolute joy it is to meet you as well!

He does have a history of speedy resolutions, it is true.

Then fix it. The Court did the only thing the Court could ethically do under the Constitution, which was return the matter to the Legislature for a proper solution. I'm sorry if the Swift Hand of Jehovah (tm) was unable to strike down the iniquitous in a sufficiently prompt manner - maybe if...

Hey, you stoleded my verbage! :lol:

IN THE MATTER OF Request for Judicial Review, as filed by Felasia Given the provisions of the TNP Law 1, sections 2 and 3, to wit; Chief Justice GROSSESCHNAUZER, the validity of whose position on the Council of Lower Officers has been called into question by the filing, and Associate...

Nopes. Ator.

I'd suppose that's up to you - I don't know that it's necessary. I will post the opinion and close the thread tomorrow A.M. (0700 US Central) barring an explicit objection.

Shumi-chan!?!?!??!

You would be correct sir. Maybe if we didn't change the Constitution every six months we could get this whole thing to work. ANYWHOM. Obviously, if this goes up, it will blow out the earlier petition as well, so let's all get agreed up beforehand, si?

Yes - the Court has yet to actually file a response to the petition.

Court threads need to remain on topic. If you feel a need to question the motivations of requests made by parties, feel free to do so in the split-out thread. If you are not filing a brief or otherwise responding with citation, please do not post here.

Please keep in mind that the Court is, for the purposes of this case, a two-membered institution. As such, any action requires a consensus - they can't just arm-wrestle to see who has to be the dissenting opinion if they can't agree.

I have indicated the Court's receipt of the filing. First thoughts - First readthrough, I concur on the first point. There was never a piece of legislation brought to vacate the prior results - in fact, there hasn't been a court ruling on the matter yet. As such, this would appear to be a...

From Felasia - I'm requesting the court to hold all re-voting on the election for CLO and Delegate. Reason: The Council of Lower Officers have no jurisdiction all power that's defined by the constitution to make a decision regarding the reelection. They can only halt the vote or any bill...