Search results

Against. Nevermind I forgot my WA isn't in the region anymore

No, I've raised this because I've noticed this being a persistent pattern of behaviour from someone, and realised that we do not have any way of policing disinformation. I recognise the inherent difficulties to this task which is why I didn't propose a solution right away. But if I were to go...

Over the past few months in the #real-life channel of the Discord server, we have had a resident of the region persistently peddle what can best at best described as extremely biased reporting, and at worst plain disinformation, specifically targeted at certain ethnic and religious groups with...

Thank you for everything you've done for the region Nutmeg! Take care of your mental health and hope you feel better soon.

A

I nominate @Simone

A

I, Gorundu, do hereby solemnly swear that during my term as Election Commissioner, I will uphold the ideals of Democracy, Freedom, and Justice of The Region of The North Pacific. I will use the powers and rights granted to me through The North Pacific Constitution and Legal Code in a legal...

Oops, apologies for forgetting to answer this question earlier. I am certainly willing to serve as an election supervisor in upcoming elections and I anticipate being more available than I was in the last few months - for the past few elections I haven't put my hand up because the timing has...

Apply for the Security Council

Aye

A

Delegate: 1. < Pallaith >

This won't matter much to many people considering most have already voted, but here are my more detailed thoughts/questions: You wrote quite a length thesis on both WA and Defence, but I struggle to identify any actions that would actually be taken. In the WA section, you wrote in the end that...

Please find some time to shit

This seems like a comprehensive analysis of the state of our region, but somewhat light on action steps. I will perhaps have specific questions later.

I nominate @Picairn @Dreadton and @Pallaith

Congratulations to Reopen Nominations

A

Delegate: < Abstain > Would you like to reopen nominations? < Yes > Vice Delegate: < Sil Dorsett > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No > Speaker: < AraFuttio > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

I nominate @St George for Delegate.

I nominate @Sil Dorsett and @Pallaith for Vice Delegate.

Can’t believe you still check your telegrams.

Question 1 (Section 4 changes): <Aye> Question 2 (Section 5 changes): <Nay> Question 3 (Section 6 changes): <Aye>

I support the new version allowing the proposer to request but giving the discretion to the Speaker.

I will state for the record that I'm against the RON change. Everything else I am in agreement with.

I think something's off with the ordering of the new Section Six clauses. I think the new clause 6 should be right after clause 2, and the new clauses 7-9 should be between the new clauses 4 and 5. Also noting that the section as it currently stands has two clauses both numbered 2, so the...

I feel like the RON part has a bit more political consideration to it. By forcing people to choose an option for RON, it creates more awareness for what RON is and puts more spotlight on the yes vote. So the change would make RON less likely to succeed. Personally, I'm in favour of the status...

I don't think anyone confused that ballot with the real Pallaith. Any reasonable person can recognise that if a private ballot ID is someone's actual name, then it's probably not that person who voted since that would have defeated the point of private voting.

Agreed. I don't see how setting your ballot ID to NuclearCheese24 harms the integrity of the private ballot.