Search results

My only worry with this bill is that making the official responsible for potentially prosecuting the delegate beholden to the delegate for appointment and re-appointment you run the risk of that official holding off on doing so so they don't risk not being re-appointed. You've tried to reduce...

Once formal debate ends and a vote is scheduled, I intend to object to the scheduling of a vote.

Nation: Gotmark Admit Ostmark as a member?: < Aye >

Delegate: 1. < Abstain > Would you like to reopen nominations? < Yes > Vice Delegate: < Chipoli > Would you like to reopen nominations? < Yes > Speaker: < Foskeburg > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

Against due to the name, otherwise in support. Yes, I am zero fun at parties.

No.

Former multi-term Speaker here. I was never hamstrung by the two legislative vote limit and it was never a problem. Spreading out votes across a longer period of time encourages good legislative practice anyway.

Against this, I don't think there's a clear benefit to changing how things work right now and I'd rather not overburden the Speakers Office with having to track and count a great many legislative votes at any one time.

Hype

As someone who heavily pushed for declassification at various times, it's clear that that was a mistake and rather than improving transparency, it's just become a bureaucratic millstone around the neck of the executive. Full support.

Why the 7th of April?

How dare you come up with a reasonable solution to an issue someone has pointed out and also depriving me of a frankly quite boring talking point given that I've said it approximately 4,000 times over the years. Full support. And exile. Twice.

Good luck Ruben.

As a note for those who aren't on the discord where this was already discussed - the Three Times You're Out Amendment did not need the delegate's signature, nor was the delegate able to Veto it, as it was a constitutional amendment.

Non-WA Against it's a shame to see so many people supporting a commendation of someone who invaded one of our treatied allies and has spent their entire career engaging in negative, malevolent actions on NS.

Justice: 1. Abstain Would you like to reopen nominations? Yes

I'm not sure it's so much me feeling tense as it is me seeing how tense quite a few people's interactions seem to have gotten. But maybe I'm reading too much into things.

Which no one has ever done, is doing or will ever do. Got an actual argument?

Which will be no funding structure, which is the intent of those behind the repeal.

Things feels a little tense to anyone else in recent weeks? Like the summer heat has raised the temperature just a little? How do y'all feel about the region - and the future given that September is coming?

Nominate @Lord Dominator

See you in three to six months.

Prince Harris Oyvindsson, blinking through what appears to be a mix of smeared mascara and a three day bender, briefly looks up from where his head had been on the small desk provided in the corner of the Gotmarker delegation's area for exactly this scenario. Hand shaking slightly, he writes...

"Against due to name". Yeah support, I guess.

Pssst you can schedule a vote, Mr Deputy Speaker :P

Seconded

Moving my TNP nation to https://www.nationstates.net/nation=mad_jack_of_the_north

Nah I was happy with the three candidates from before, so I didn't vote to reopen nominations.

Sure why not.

Nominating: @Halsoni @Polgaria @Fachu @Bran Astor @Sil Dorsett @Blue Wolf II @Caldrasa @Kaschovia @ForFishing @Chipoli @Skaraborg @QuietDad @Siwale @Pallaith @Simone @Mastenva @Faralried @Petronellania @Great Bights Mum @Marcus Antonius @Gorundu @Rom @Varanius @AraFuttio...