Search results

Delegate: 1. < Simone > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No > Vice Delegate: < Chipoli > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No > Speaker: 1. < Abstain > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

This declaration is drier than salted sand and duller than gritted mud. I am against it.

I am in favour of this proposal. Because of the admittedly compelling reasons provided by NVXL, I will briefly explain why. This proposal’s function is to create a broad-brushed framework in which member-nations have to operate. It can’t specify individual ingredients, owing to the different...

I am in favour of this proposal. It addresses the issues of the target well, and it will clear the way for a superior replacement.

The question regarding the rules is far more interesting than the content of this proposal. Even if not illegal for stepping on the GA’s turf, I dislike it nonetheless for its lack of vision. There is a brief suggestion about the SC condemning future nations because of slavery. This could have...

This repeal does not present very convincing arguments, so I am against it.

Could you please provide an example of something intangible or innutritious which is developed for sapient consumption?

As the coauthor, I am naturally for this proposal. ITSC is a fine resolution where domesric transport is concerned. However, it not only fails to address international transport whatsoever, it also actively prevents further legislation on the topic.

This is badly written in places. I do not think that it should become part of the canon of the Security Council, irrespective of its contribution to the natives. I am therefore against.

This is some low-scope, precise legislation which carefully addresses a specific problem. I am therefore for this proposal.

I am for this proposal. This is a very comprehensive way of prohibiting whole-life orders for minors, and that is a goal that is worthy of legislation.

This is absurd. I am present.

Considering that there is native support, I will vote in favour.

Because there are sanctions, I cannot vote as I usually would. I will settle for being present and not voting.

This proposal has one argument, and that one argument is not particularly compelling. There is a compelling need to balance the right of minors to protected from harmful content with the right of free press. By not specifying what qualifies as “appropriate”, the target allows member-nations to...

I am for this proposal. It forms part of the growing corpus of legislation that delineates which punishments are acceptable under the law of the General Assembly.

For

This seems uncontroversial, so I will vote in favour.

This legislation makes joining a non-aggression pact an integral part of membership of the World Assembly. That seems to be a good thing, so I am in favour of this proposal. Just as with any other pact, it is true that a member-nation can circumvent by leaving it. However, disincentivising war...

I’m not certain about the rationale behind the third clause, because it seems to open member-nations towards incentivising illegal entry. I also would have liked to have seen greater consideration of citizens whose only citizenships are in partly unrecognised states, such as Abkhazia in real...

I am for this proposal. Similarly to any trust, it is vital that property over which there is equitable title by someone other than the legal owner is distinguished from property over which there is no equitable title held by the same. This is necessary to how banking works, because it provides...

I am for this proposal, because I support its intention and I don’t see any negative collateral effects from how it achieves its intention.

I don’t see the need for this proposal. It would have been amusing if it were to have passed on the twenty-ninth, but even that would not rise to the level of a declaration. I also note with disappointment that the wording on this is not great. Therefore, I will vote against this proposal.

This seems to be a sensible regulatory measure to standardise requirements as to disclosure across the General Assembly. That is a topic fit for international legislation, and this proposal handles the topic well, so I am voting for the proposal.

I am in favour of this proposal. It is a sensible measure to standardise the provision of medical equipment across the World Assembly. Although it is slightly more granular in its detailing than most resolutions, this does not seem to cause any problems, due to common-sense restraint in choosing...

This is a matter of Gameplay, and it seems as though the Gameplaying part of this proposal no longer does anything, I will vote for abstaining.

This seems reasonable, so I will vote in favour.

I don’t see any issues with this. It is precisely the role of the General Assembly to assist member-nations in developing transnational policies and arrangements. As such, I vote for this proposal.

The definition of “animal” is not scientifically accurate but it is nonetheless useful within the context of this piece of legislation. Seeing as the acts prohibited by this proposal are obviously and uncontroversially immoral, I vote in favour of it.

I am voting for this proposal. The vast majority of the issues that were raised with its previous version has been addressed, such as the definition of discrimination and the problem surrounding linguistic fluency. I therefore feel confident that this is not only a good replacement for GA #035...