Search results

Ruling of the Court of The North Pacific In regards to the Judicial Inquiry filed by TlomzKrano on the Reconsideration of the Constraints of the NPA while on Joint Raiding Operations Opinion drafted by Chief Justice Pallaith, joined by Justice Nutmeg The Squirrel, and Justice Vivanco, who filed...

I will join the draft posted by Pallaith with a separate concurrence.

As I was drafting and re-drafting, I ended up deciding with this idea as it seemed the most sound after exploring it. My primary concern currently with your argument is not that it's wrong, but that for what I believe are the needs of the R4R I still remain of the thought that the Court could...

Ruling of the Court of The North Pacific In regards to the judicial inquiry filed by TlomzKrano on Reconsideration of the Constraints of the NPA while on Joint Raiding Operations Opinion drafted by Justice Vivanco, joined by Justices The Court took into consideration the inquiry filed here...

I am working on it, I'm trying to fix some essential stuff such as my own clarity and some typos that I seem to have missed.

I agree with the current draft

Either that, indeed, or use [...] if you stick to that method. However, Nutmeg's suggestion is more appropiate in my opinion

I'd change the holding's textual part, the two "..." doesn't quite convince me.

Just for clarity, I will be posting a draft of my own in this day/weekend.

It is still being deliberated on, we shall bring forward a draft soon and then, if approved, we shall deliver on this R4R.

Ah, one of my first rulings that I joined. Let's see how things have changed in these times. Before posting a proper draft opinion, that I will be the one doing since I would like to, I will be posting my thoughts, and if we're all on the same page, following that same train of thought, I shall...

The matter at hand is easy. In the past, the Security Council would have been exempt from the FOIA, but as of the current status of the law, such statement is defunct, as it is considered in the most literal of senses as it is mentioned directly in the Legal Code. This is but an example of a...

After taking a close inspection on the case, I agree on the draft presented!

The briefing period is closed, and the Court will now begin deliberating.

The Court Examiner has opened before us a brand new Request for Review here. Briefing period has opened, and it'll end in five days (On the 6th)

The Court accepts this request for review, and I will serve as the Moderating Justice. The Court does not recognize any responsible government official to be recognized as respondent, given this is a Court decision under review. At this time the Court will accept briefs from any interested...

We have unanimously chosen to reappoint @TlomzKrano

I'd like access to the Bar Commission's forum as per my appointment and my oath! Appointment: https://forum.thenorthpacific.org/topic/9049939/post-10696312 Oath: https://forum.thenorthpacific.org/topic/7019276/post-10696544

I would like to get involved as much as I am allowed to!

I, Vivanco, do hereby solemnly swear that during my term as Bar Commissioner, I will uphold the ideals of Democracy, Freedom, and Justice of The Region of The North Pacific. I will use the powers and rights granted to me through The North Pacific Constitution and Legal Code in a legal...

I apologize yet again for my lack of response, I've been away from home. I have a small question about the clerk system, will it need to be added to the Court Rules? Will it be managed by all of the justices, or only by one? Other than that, it sounds good.

I, Vivanco, do hereby solemnly swear that during my term as Justice, I will uphold the ideals of Democracy, Freedom, and Justice of The Region of The North Pacific. I will use the powers and rights granted to me through The North Pacific Constitution and Legal Code in a legal, responsible, and...

Court Justice: 1. Abstain Would you like to reopen nominations? Yes

The role of the Court Examiner is that of investigating, reviewing and presenting before the Court potentially outdated rulings in order to "unify" and make the region's laws and rulings coherent with eachother and with the evolution of the region's ever-growing legal being, with the fact that...

Sure! Let's go one by one. On this, I would see On Standing and the Definition of Affected Party, as before going in depth into the matter, it is in the interest of the Court that the person that submits the R4R has a proper standing. In this case, that's established on the fourth point of the...

I am in favour of it!

I am! I haven't gotten the proper opportunity to do so. I was given the option this time, but I seem to have missed it and the intention. There's always next time, and I am absolutely interested!

This will, I believe, be important in future R4Rs, I believe. I like it. It's well versed, and structured. Perhaps a bit "Word-Wall", I would break some of the paragraphs to give more space and make reading better, instead of three big paragraphs, but that's a matter of preferences.

Thank you, Simone! Oh, I wish! No. This lovely design was made (and commissioned to) my good friend Quinmael! My thoughts have been changing as time has moved on. At first, I was against it, because the alternative seemed far away, but now that we have an active Bar and a Court Examiner, I...

Thank you for the support! ^_^