Search results

That makes an absolute majority at least, results will be posted promptly

A

The 12-hour-long challenge period has now passed, and the Election Commission is now ready to vote on whether or not to certify the March 2026 General Election Results as given to them by the Election Supervisors, per Section 4, Clause 10 of the Election Commission Rules: The vote will have...

The allies/enemies list was just moved to the diplomacy section, I assume so we don’t have it twice and can just point to one spot

65% seems reasonable The % is always adjustable (amend the law again), the idea of using the % is that we can hopefully keep the same basic level as a % no matter the absolute level, and thus not need to adjust this again if population crashes or spikes

Aye

I, Lord Dominator, do hereby solemnly swear that during my term as Deputy Minister of Military Affairs, I will uphold the ideals of Democracy, Freedom, and Justice of The Region of The North Pacific. I will use the powers and rights granted to me through The North Pacific Constitution and Legal...

Against

Personally I tend to think the fact that thus far literally no other applicant has even attempted to use the exception to my knowledge indicates that it doesn’t especially need to be an option. That admin check failure at this point only includes proxying and multiple accounts furthers this, as...

I, Lord Dominator, do hereby solemnly swear that during my term as Election Commissioner, I will uphold the ideals of Democracy, Freedom, and Justice of The Region of The North Pacific. I will use the powers and rights granted to me through The North Pacific Constitution and Legal Code in a...

I will 100% say that I just forgot that it was like that, so the % part of my suggestion can probably be ignored

I would generally agree with Gorundu, a floating requirement tied to a position would seem to resolve the problem of both declines like this bill seeks to solve and any potential increases (both short and long term). I would note that it would make sense to tie both, but each separately &...

It’s an entirely fair thing to pose to me specifically and the same reason why I am willing to say that I won’t seek EC again should I vacate (or not post an oath) office in the same manner as I have in the past - I do indeed have a history of it that others don’t.

That seems reasonable

Against while it lacks replacement (of either kind)

I can confirm one of my motivations to enter the race was to make the election more interesting than a one-sided beatdown of one of my aforementioned opponents by the other one.

I am once more running for Justice. Prior experience include numerous former terms as Justice (approximately matching my opponent in their own record-holding number I believe), a few turns as prosecutor as defense counsel, and some number of briefs submitted for R4Rs. Normally I am not one to...

I accept my nomination

Against

Could we potentially get the treaty archives split between active and repealed treaties? It would help for searches

Apparently I mixed up when the general term elections are, Halsoni has the right of it as to the potential benefit

There’s not much we can do to solve the summer lull problem, but having it mostly contained in one term instead of awkwardly split between two could potentially at least make the term itself less horrible.

I agree with Pallaith - I certainly don’t think it’ll hurt to try moving the election times (on the general election side, more importantly) and this version would make it rather easier to revert it later if needs be.

A

The 12-hour-long challenge period has now passed, and the Election Commission is now ready to vote on whether or not to certify the September 2026 General Election Results as given to them by the Election Supervisors, per Section 4, Clause 10 of Election Commission law: The vote will have two...

I mean if that’s the feeling then it has been considered, I just felt it should be raised to be sure

Support

My main first thought here is that the General Election being moved should also get the 6-month term that the Justices would or the 2 month split should be the January one - it seems a bit not great to cut a Delegate term in half in the middle of the election for that term. Also it would be...

The full panel has reviewed the objection brought by Pallaith and has unanimously agreed that the acceptance was indeed done in error. The request for review is thus rejected. The petitioner is free to resubmit a template-compliant version.

I will accept this request for review. @Halsoni is identified as a respondent. The submission period for brief will be tentatively set at 7 day, given potential interest in this already expressed.