Search results

I appoint @Dreadton and @Sil Dorsett to supervise the Special Election for Vice Delegate.

Oh, wow, Yuno dropped to an Epic? Well, in that case... Destination nation: Darcania Link to card: https://www.nationstates.net/page=deck/card=1262891/season=2

I love it, this is a style setup that I can get used to.

Citizens are also checked for IC security threats by the Vice Delegate, and take a legally binding oath in order to hold them to account if they break our laws. Citizens have a much higher level of accountability than Residents.

Such people misremembered your stance, and such comments stopped once I pointed out your previous comment that predated those comments in the citizens chat on discord.

Against.

It's up to us to legislate and to the Delegate to execute - let details of implimentation such as that be left to the Delegate, and let us set down the standards of what should be accomplished.

Voters who don't vote for any candidate, or only vote for one or two candidates, have their votes counted as Abstain for the remainder of the ballot until all three options are filled.

Gameplay in-character and roleplay in-character are two very different things. If I were to win at Monopoly through tricky and underhanded business practices, I am an asshole in-character for that game; if I were to win at Monopoly through cheating, I am an asshole out-of-character. I don't have...

@Fregerson will also require masking, and both need to be added to the government sheet. Fregerson's oath: https://forum.thenorthpacific.org/topic/7019276/post-10305126 Wonderess's oath: https://forum.thenorthpacific.org/topic/7019276/post-10305633

Court Justice (select up to 3): < Lady Raven Wing | Wonderess | Zyvetskistaahn > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

Court Justice (select up to 3): < Lady Raven Wing | Wonderess | Zyvetskistaahn > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

Against. This joke has already been done before, let's not clog up the SC's resolutions with unoriginal gaff.

TNP Nation: Darcania Discord ID: Zephyrkul#1089 Publication: Editing Team

I am not eligible to run in this election, due to being an election supervisor.

I'm unsure where this rhetoric of "too many Commissioners" even comes from. This argument was already dismissed as nonsense for many more recent nominations to the Security Council, why should it apply here? The law allows for between 5 and 9 commissioners, and if there are enough volunteers...

@Angshire and I will supervise the March 2020 Judicial Election.

The commission as a whole is involved in the election process. The supervisors are the ones actively handling the election. I believe that the best way to learn is to jump in as a supervisor to start out with, so you have at least some experience to draw from in case the commission as a whole...

It's too late still for Fregerson to be appointed as a supervisor and to learn the ropes of supervising elections.

Against, because of the tag:wa telegram

I would like to note two things to the motioners. 1) Fregerson has yet to answer Zyvet's questions, likely due to limited internet time; and 2) By the time the vote would finish, Fregerson would be absent from their office due to what will be the ongoing Judicial election, and thus there is no...

For. Because of the title.

you are all terrible at following instructions

// @name Guildies Auction Highlighter UwU why

For.

Abstain.

Yes. Six (the amount we currently have) is above the legal minimum of five, to be sure, but it's safer to have at least seven so that the Chief EC doesn't so frequently have to appoint temporary replacements in the case of absences, or in the case of EC terms expiring before the RA can confirm...

Might I also make a request for the left side of the forum list's cells have some inside padding on the left so the folder icon isn't pushed up directly against the left side? Preferably to the same amount that the thread list's padding is at.

Not enough floof, 4/10

Why couldn't you have just said that three posts ago.