Search results

Oh goody the 4th July is over.

I must concur, I don't see the point of merely having a seperate UN Delegate for the sake of it. Giving the PM the Delegacy will do that.

I lend this my support

Shouldn't that be Deputy not Duputy? Though I do worry that we are blurring the lines of Justice by having him as a Deputy Minister of that Office?

Every system has its plus points, however I feel that the one proposed has more benefits and gains to be made then merely keeping the current one. We have a chance to make the Prime Minister a much more powerful role and to make the whole system a little more centralised and efficent. At the...

Yes, but are we merely to keep the Status Quo because of that?

Yes but say the UN Delegate goes AWOL. The region is ruined.

However he has nothing to back up his claims, for the Delegate holds the region.

Do we really need to get into this.... :hug:

I believe it is common for the role of Delegate and Head of Government to be merged in most places, and it makes sense here just as much.

Well one could argue that the Government is his portfolio and that he really should have his finger in every pot as it were.

One can argue in a variety of manners on that issue. As they frequently they do there.

I think that most people have accepted that they need to work with others and thus Democracy is the most popular system. Dictatorships can work, but again they rely on the Majority of people supporting them otherwise they will just be overthrown or people will leave.

If I may add my two cents, I believe that this probably should be got rid of. As to be honest, it no longer for me seems to be filling its purpose.

I think merging the PM and the Delegate makes sense here. I don't quite see the reason why the PM shouldn't be trusted to be able to cope with both roles. As he has been elected to become the leader of the Region, why not in both a IC sense (in terms of being elected PM) and the OCC sense (being...

Thank you very much.

As I say, that is why I would say that perhaps a Constitutional Monarchy is more correct in most places.

Only because people were willing to have a change however. If they didn't agree people would just set up a new region.

Well I would certainly consider the New Meritocracy a great region, bias or no bias, and we have a rule by majority there. Democracy in action.

Nothing in my way - Keane

Very nice article, and it does raise some interesting points certainly.

I am British

Hmmm perhaps I should of joined this Chapter ;)

Welcome back

^Needs to post less

Very sad news this, very sad.

Exceptions prove the rule however.

If I were delegate I would play mind games with Fedele.

^ Has more then I