• The NationStates server was subjected to a data breach. TNP Forums do NOT interact with the NS servers and remain secure. If you use the same password between the two sites, it is recommended you change your password.

Search results

  1. F

    The North Pacific v. JAL

    The witness is excused for now but the witness is still under oath and may be called back as a witness.
  2. F

    The North Pacific v. JAL

    I AM KEEPING TRACK OF THE TRIAL AND THE QUESTION OF THE WITNESSES
  3. F

    October 2011 Judicial Election

    yes for a regular justice
  4. F

    October 2011 Judicial Election

    I will not be running for Chief Justice this coming election would like to be nominated for just a regular justice.
  5. F

    The North Pacific v. JAL

    keeping track of the questions
  6. F

    Complaints

    So if a justices cannot throw it out how about a majority of the judges
  7. F

    Requesting clarification.

    The Justification that adding a time limit on who can enter the RA to me is unconstitutional it seems that if we have people who want to vote in the election should be able to what harm is it that they may not be able to run in the election but they should be able to vote.
  8. F

    Requesting clarification.

    i hear by grant an injunction to the 15 day rule
  9. F

    Peanut Gallery, et. al. comments from Criminal Complaint

    as chief justice i have an overall view of the trial but will not give any more statements. considered this as a warning any more negative comment towards the justices will not be tolerated and if not stop will have to establish a gag order on the trial.
  10. F

    The North Pacific v. JAL

    sustain get on with the questioning
  11. F

    The North Pacific v. JAL

    yes you may
  12. F

    The North Pacific v. JAL

    ANY FURTHER QUESTION IF NOT PROCEED WITH THE CROSS EXAMINATION
  13. F

    The Last Book You Read...

    i just finished reading Louis XIV and Twenty Million Frenchmen by Pierre Golibert
  14. F

    New Map

    falconkats a nation of over 11 billion would like to stay on the island
  15. F

    The North Pacific v. JAL

    since they have confirmed the masking you may proceed in questioning the witness.
  16. F

    The North Pacific v. JAL

    LET THE CROSS EXAMINING OF THE DEFENSE WITNESS BEGIN
  17. F

    The North Pacific v. JAL

    with out any objections
  18. F

    Amendment to Judicial Process

    it does only if it violates the constitution
  19. F

    The North Pacific v. JAL

    may call your first witness
  20. F

    Requesting clarification.

    i do not see any problems what this request
  21. F

    The North Pacific v. JAL

    REQUSTING a sidebar of councils please lets keep the question and the statement from the prosecution to the issue at hand the first issue that is on hand is only the charge of the rejection of the defendant RA application the defense objection is sustained.
  22. F

    The North Pacific v. JAL

    that exhibit e cannot be using during the trial and the charges will be defended and prosecuted during this trial so please can we start on the opening statements or i will have a ruling. the court's patients is run very thin.
  23. F

    Freedom of Information Request

    6. No one shall be admitted or re-admitted to the Assembly when an election or special election is in progress. Admission shall be effective once the election results are announced. According to the law governing Registration and Membership Felesia I believe and would state that you are not...
  24. F

    The North Pacific v. JAL

    Well as far of the alleged coup there is no statues of limitations on bring someone for trial on these charges and as far of the Speaker's imparality is duly noted and your objection is noted. And due to the fact that they have not been elected as Delegate.
  25. F

    The North Pacific v. JAL

    My ruling on Exhibit E is Sustained and will not be able to be used as evidence but Exhibit A,B,C,D and F will be entered as evidence with no objections.
  26. F

    The North Pacific v. JAL

    exhibits a-f entered as evidence with no objections
  27. F

    The North Pacific v. JAL

    we will hear the charge one at a time during this trial.
  28. F

    The North Pacific v. JAL

    As far as a Justice not being called as a witness is upheld due to the fact that cannot have a justice as a witness then come back and oversee the Trial.
Back
Top