Search results

And given what we've seen here during this trial, do you believe BW has been disloyal and/or has acted in a manner irresponsible to the Constitution and laws to our region?

Once again:

Rhindon Blade's testimony here is as an expert witness, as he was one of the investigators looking into BW heinous plot. He discovered the evidence he is commenting on and he delivered the evidence he is commenting on. I see no reason why his own account on his own research for should be...

Looking over exhibit B and C, does it appear to you that BW had done more than speak of a plot? What would you say were his actions? And other than FEC, what other high endorsement or high influence members of the North Pacific did he attempt to bring into the plot?

So once again, Rhindon Blade, can you attest that the following evidence has not been tampered with and is a truthful representation?

First of all, there are no more juries under this Constitution. The prosecution would recommend the defense read the constitution before citing it. Second of all, the evidence has already been reviewed by the judge and has been accepted. The accused may not like what he has done, may wish he...

Actually the following was part of the first introduction of new evidence. The prosecution thinks the defense team should better coordinate, though I believe it would be helpful to show the evidence rejected before the court just to prove this...

And it is from these sources that you can confirm the veracity of the following? (The prosecution apologizes for the size and subsequent warping of this thread.) The prosecution introduces the following as Exhibit B and... Exhibit C

Please state for the Court the positions you've held in the region of the North Pacifc, what specific position you held during the time of the incident (during April of this year,) and how you came to know about BW's plot to overthrow the Delegate?

THANKS! Especially since Bush left office, making this game obsolete. That is until they make a throw Obama game as well.

The prosecution calls Rhindon Blade to the stand and ask that he swears to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

NAY and how did this one slip through?

The prosecution asks the court to clarify just who is the designated counsel for the defense, or will it just be any and all who'd like to comment?

The prosecution and the past two pages of testimony from FEC, proves it did occur; as much as you may wish it now it didn't. And the prosecution requests the defense to allow the trial to proceed, the claims by the defense are quite frankly what this entire trial is about. Now speaking out of...

Objection! The law is clear, Blue Wolf intentionally sought out FEC to usurp Sydia on the nationstates website. And is this a wrestling match? Will the defense settle on a counsel and stop tagging each other in and out of the ring?

Thank you.

And finally, do you believe that BW was attempting to incite you, (to rouse, stir up, or excite,) you to break the law by overthrowing Sydia as delegate in the nationstates game?

So you would say that if he did approach someone else then that would be proof he broke his oath?

Thank you. And now not to belabour the point but upon closer inspection, given your recollection of your conversation with Blue Wolf, do you believe that in the transcript provided, Blue Wolf did not break the following oath? (Emphasis mine:) For greater clarity, did nothing in that...

Now is it correct that you have dealt with Blue Wolf while in service to the North Pacific over the past several years? Given the two years with him on your MSN, or more given your past service to this region, did you have any reason to believe that this was not Blue Wolf speaking to you? Did...

Now FEC, may I ask how long BW has been on your MSN list? Over the course of the years, which e-mail address was given, and how familiar the Evil Wolf alias is to you?

I have... decided to calm down as being too passionate makes me sound hostile puts people off... pft, well that lasted all of two seconds.

bout time. /signed.

As I was going to reveal in my redirect, it reveals the motive, intent, and opportunity towards committing, and the very act of comitting all the charges he is accused of. The defence may prefer theatrics and sanctimonious speeches, however I prefer resting on the evidence and the testimony...

May the accused please relay their questions through their defense counsels and not out of turn. Redirect, your honour?

Thank you. Defense's witness.

Do you believe that in doing this, BW was intending to commit treason and break his oath to the region?

Could you please state to the Court, what Blue Wolf had wanted to do with you, what his intentions were, and whether you believed him to be serious or joking.

And please state any other alias' you go by in relation to Exhibit A.

The prosecution would like to enter the following as Exhibit A: Now FEC, would you say the following piece of evidence is an accurate and unedited account of your discussion with Blue Wolf?