Search results

Congrats to Ghost and Cabinet!

Thanks for the promotion and thanks for the congrats! Kasto those flags are amazing!

It is released! Good job to everyone!

Ruling of the Court of The North Pacific In regards to the Judicial Inquiry filed by Dreadton on the Definition of a Candidate Opinion drafted by Chief Justice Pallaith, joined by Justice Kronos and THO Tlomz, with Justice Sil Dorsett recused The Court took into consideration the inquiry filed...

Looks good to me!

1

I noticed some things of my own that may need some edits. First, for the second paragraph under the Candidate section where it states that an election was restarted because a name was left off of a ballot despite the ballot being amended to include the name, is that occasion linked to a past...

From my perspective it seems pretty straight forward. To start, I strongly disagree with Sil's model of the strictest interpretation of the letter of the law. The model, which suggests that a candidate who withdraws is still considered a candidate but they are only left off the ballot, doesn't...

Delegate: 1. < Pallaith> 2. < Lord Dominator > 3. < Pathoal > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No > Vice Delegate: < Sir Kasto > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No > Speaker: < Vivanco > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

The time for briefs is over. The Court will now deliberate.

This is where we can discuss the ongoing R4R. I have a link to it here for reference.

This request for review is accepted. I will be taking up the position of Moderating Justice over this review. The period for submitting briefs is now open and shall remain open for one day. The respondent will be notified as per Court Procedures Chapter 2.3-4. With Justice Sil recused from the...

:dance:Victory dance-off!

Ruling of the Court of The North Pacific In regards to the Judicial Inquiry filed by DiamondComodo on the Regulation of the Regional Message Board. Opinion drafted by Pallaith, joined by Kronos and Sil Dorsett The Court took into consideration the inquiry filed here by DiamondComodo The Court...

I think you took care of the spellings I found earlier so that's good. I like the flow of the sections and their order I think they balance well. Tomorrow evening sounds like an optimal time.

This brings together all of the thoughts we discussed over the course of this case and connects them well. I do not think I can think of anything else that needs to be added or considered.

In the first section on overruling the portion of Executive Staff, would it be best to show which portion is being overruled so we have it on record? I found a spelling error here. There is a spelling error here too. Other than that I think the draft is very well written so far. Do you have...

35

I'm not supportive of maneuvering around the question. As we saw in Executive Staffing the Court was approached with a simple question by the Peitioner, "were my rights violated?" The Court decided not to give an answer because it was the opinion of the Court, mainly SillyString, that with the...

Luckily for me I was listed as the beneficiary!

How would you argue against the constitutionality of said law? I have had minor considerations of my own, but not about the constitutionality. Where would you say the conflict is?

For

With what has been said previously about taking into consideration the many factors that play into whether or not a post is suppressed on the RMB brings us back to the crucial fact that context matters. This is supported by the Legal Code as it limits the context of speech in its own way by...

1370

55

257

I realized as well while analyzing the briefs thoroughly that there is a clear distinction between them. The brief submitted by Zyvet focuses on the IC/Legal perspective while the brief submitted by Dreadton argues from the OOC/Moderation perspective. From an OOC perspective I am of the belief...

8

Hammond, Louisiana, US

The time for submitting briefs is over. The Court will now deliberate.