Search results

regarding point 2-- it states 'a three fifths supermajority' and neglects 'of votes cast' or 'of the regional assembly'. Sticking with a traditionalist sticky interpretation, if you will, we should say that it could go either way on that. Therefore point 2 would have to become 2) RA Rule 1 is...

If half of the provisions say votes cast and half don't, its entirely unreasonable to say that we should sweepingly say that we must go with the mentality of all and not of simply votes cast. A constitution in its natural state is flexible and we must realize that. Perhaps an exact count of...

So you both want to shake up the status quo and conform strictly to the wording? I'm of the belief that wording is flexible and we can't interpret it exactly precisely as written, we need to look to see what the meaning of it is.

Is it really reasonable, in an online game in a feeder region, when the RA could be of massive size since anyone can join it, to assume that the entire RA could vote on something? I hardly think its reasonable or that it should be read like that.

I go for the 'only of votes cast' option.

This has been seen and will be discussed.

TNP Nation: Mahaj Representative WA Nation: Mahaj WA Seat Speaker of the Assembly: Limi

Your comments are out of place.

Yep, in agreement.

I see. I would think that as there are no justices, the delegate taking over the attorney general position would be useless. I shall read more of the laws tonight.

But then, as your question in the OP is framed, why would the Delegate be able to take over the AG's position if just the justices were inactive. If the entire judiciary had to be inactive... then what would qualify as inactive?

Okay i have a question... does judiciary refer to the Attorney General *and* the Justices, or just the justices, or just the AG?

I do not have any questions at this time. :/

I agree with us hearing the judicial request. However, as the injunction means the case would be going on as we review the delegate's actions to drop the case, it doesn't make much sense to me, as we could be reviewing something and the whole thing could end up being moot and a waste of time. I...

I, Mahaj, do hereby solemnly swear that during my duly elected term as Associate Justice of The North Pacific, I will uphold the ideals of Democracy, Freedom, and Justice of The Region of The North Pacific. I will use the powers and rights granted to me through The North Pacific Constitution and...

Everybody in TNP celebrate The Rejected Realms has fallen! :P

nope Eluvatar?

A real shocker, isn't it.

Mahaj Representative Mahaj WA Seat Chief Justice: Grimalkin A.J Vote 1: Mahaj A.J. Vote 2: Dyr Nasad A.G. : Eluvatar

for

i will accept the nomination.

RA Nation: Mahaj Representative WA Nation: M-A-H-A-J (at this time) Delegate: Blue Wolf Vice Delegate: abstain Speaker of the RA: abstain

Dyr

Indeed. What did the Nazis do to deserve that comparison?

Are things that bad a whole new Constitution is needed?

no Harm?

Good luck Gov.

no! uh... BS?

can we make it 29 days because after 28 days of inactivity you're deleted?

Okay, here are some things. First of all, this bill tries to accomplish too many things. You probably should focus just on a single thing and write about that. There's nothing wrong with multiple bills, but a bill encompassing a lot of things just doesn't make much sense. so you might write...