Search results

Not that my voice counts for much, I'll go ahead and sign this. The last time I remember a court case in TNP dragging out this bad was Fulhead's trial almost 5 years ago where the entire jury went missing, much like the current court, and it was decided the charges would be dismissed.

I'm a TNPer and my TNP nation is very odd and random. Just for the record my WA at this time is Limitless Events.

I have no objections either

I would like to file the following complaints against Govindia for his actions during the September 2011 General Election where he served as Election Commissioner: 1. Violation of TNP Law 26 - As The Voting Booth he set requirements for one to be a candidate in the Sept. 2011 General Election...

No time limit on who can join the RA was added though. The 15 days applies to removal from the RA. This was an amendment to Section Two, Article II of Law 28 in the Legal Code which changed the time without posting before a member was required to be removed by the Speaker from 30 days to 15...

Activini was never given a trial for their actions so I guess at the time things were "even-handed" as no one was put on trial for anything they did. Let's go with flem. Had he been the one behind Activini and this information known to GBM I'm sure her actions would have been different.

I believe you are misunderstanding my statements. Whether or not the morality of GBM's actions was right or not but the way in which it was done broke the laws of TNP and she was never put on trial. In TNP, if someone breaks the law but something the region sees as "good" comes from those...

I believe the issue is not a fair vs. unfair argument regarding GBM's action but rather right or wrong. GBM ejected the nation of Activini for reasons other than specified by the SC when she could have asked the SC to revise their statement to allow Activini to be ejected for the unendorsement...

In her post announcing my banning GBM states that I had by that point stopped tarting. I forget the exact moment I stopped tarting but it was around the time of the SC announcement but endorsements do tend to filter in for a time afterwards and there was no national happenings at the time to...

At the time no, later on I believe Blue Wolf revealed what the source of the information was. I believe he concluded I got the information from my ability to view IP Addresses as MoIIA but that did not explain how I managed to also get the emails of board members. I have no evidence, merely...

That is a tricky question to answer, but overall I'd have to say no it isn't. GBM ejected the nation of Activini illegally, and while the nation in question was seeking to subvert her rule as delegate due process was not followed. Was she ever put on trial? No, charges were brought forth by the...

In October 2006 I was serving as MoIIA who was charged with overseeing RA membership. At the time TNP was in a state of "war" with The Lexicon, a war that I saw as pointless. I decided that I would try for delegate in the upcoming elections and make one of my goals to end this conflict. I knew I...

I can confirm for the court that I have access to this topic and am present.

TNP defines Election Fraud as follows: You, yourself, have stipulated requirements to be listed on the ballot not found in any governing document (requiring candidates to be seconded) and decided to leave out the 3 day campaigning period required to be held between nominations and voting after...

The link you provided takes me to a post made by Elu on the 30th in the Amendment to Law 22 Preliminary Discussion topic. As for contacting people the law requires they shall be removed by the Speaker after 15 days of inactivity, nothing is mentioned about them returning in a reasonable amount...

Under Law 29 of TNP Legal Code any registered citizens and/or governments residing in The North Pacific have the right to request information from the Government through the Delegate and the designated officers of the Executive. As such I am requesting to know if the following accounts posted...

I would like to point out that there are four nations listed on the RA roster who, according to posts that I have permission to view, have not posted for period of 15+ days, 3 of whom have since posted. The nations in question are: Eluvatar: posted on the 13th of August, next post occurs on...

As the Speaker has addressed the nations listed in my opening post that is no longer an issue, I just ask that the court make sure that the RA membership is properly kept up to date until the election period is over as several members are on the verge of going 15 days without posting. As for my...

As some of you may know, today marks the anniversary of the start of The August Revolution. This marks Francos Spain's ascension to the delegacy and the overthrow of a regime who answered to foreign interests and not to The Pacific. After five days, on September 1st, 2003, the New Pacific Order...

Banned from the forum with the account Limitless Events by flem for events that happened years ago. Events which claim I violated the ToS for this forum even though alleged actions never took place on this forum and was initially placed as a full IP ban immediately contrary to the board rules...

I'm not actually a member of the RA right now. I applied originally on May 21st, 2010 and was accepted by Dyr Nasad, who was Speaker at the time. I goofed and didn't post for 30 days. At the time Grimalkin was Speaker and not taking any action as Speaker but I retook the oath and was re-accepted...

I did not bring this to the attention of Speaker, however Delegate Blackshear posted 48 hours ago in the Roster thread that the list needed to be updated. No action nor notice of intent to take action has been made by the Speaker despite having been online and posting on the forum during that time.

This is actually two requests but they are connected so I'll post them both in here. Elections are just around the corner and things are not in order. The RA Roster was last updated on the 21st of August by the Speaker. However several nations listed on the roster have met criteria for removal...

As my application to the RA is nearing 14 days old without an acceptance or denial I'd like the court to explain the following: What is considered "responding to an applicant? In my case, the speaker has posted in the designated thread that my application is currently under review, but is this...

Reapplying once more

In the post found here Westwind states that JAL, Blue Wolf, Dali, and Ermarian are ineligible to run for office.

I'll keep this simple, I plan to coup but not in a major way. I'll only be removing 2 parts of the current system and then creating one new part. Very little will change and everyone will be free to do everything they've been doing. The first thing I'll remove is any mention or requirement of a...

Ah yes, you are correct. I was posting those eligible to run for positions and forgot to add in those who could vote but not run for office. Doesn't change things much in the long run though. For convenience here are the 30+ day periods without posting for each member in question. As far as I...

I've gone and dug a bit further and found that Moany Old Gits, Roman, and Gracius Maximus are the only RA members to not have a period of 30+ days without a post since either joining the RA or June of 2009. I went 30 days without a post but then I reapplied the the RA immediately and was...

From the information I can see, which may be limited or incomplete, the following people have been in the RA for the last 30 days, have not gone without posting in a 30 day period , and the nation listed in their RA application is still correct Limi Moany Old Gits Roman The following have...