Search results

A few weeks ago @Pallaith had called our justice system a "sham and an international joke" and described what he believed to be the flaws of the system. Do you agree with his opinions? If so, what do you think are the potential steps that the Court can take to address them? If you don't agree...

Pass, I'm supervising

For

For

Nation in The North Pacific: Gorundu Ministry you are interested in joining: WA Affairs Discord Username (if applicable): an_dr_ew

I nominate @Simone

It doesn't really matter if people float in and out of threshold, because the only time it needs to be checked is when someone actually applies, which is not very frequent. Also, the endorsement requirement for an eligible application is already a floating requirement, being 50% of the...

A few months ago @Sil Dorsett made this observation in his Vice Delegate's report: I'm not sure how many people saw this, I personally only found it some time later because I accidentally changed pages while viewing the Vice Delegate's Desk thread and this was conveniently located at the bottom...

Against

Aye

A

The arguments supporting this repeal are incredibly weak and if it is the real world, any pretence that an organisation such as the WA could operate without a physical headquarters would be utter nonsense. If this is what the government believes makes for a so-called improvement in the quality...

Justice: 1. < Attempted Socialism > 2. < Nutmeg The Squirrel > 3. < Ashita > Would you like to reopen nominations < No >

You’re too short

Typical liberal voter

Against. GA#8 is an iconic resolution that should not lose its existence to NatSovs. A HQ is absolutely necessary for an organisation of this scope, and the authors of the repeal clearly have no intention of replacing it. The double taxing aspect which the repeal makes out to be a big issue is...

Halsoni healed the divisions between me and my wife. There are no divisions Halsoni could not heal.

Yes, that's what I meant as well. I was posting in a rush and didn't check my phrasing. Guess that's a lesson for me.

Yes just restart it as soon as possible

I don't see why we should separate eligibility criteria for elections and RA votes. The proposed rules can be easily applied to both. The Speaker can easily identify who was the last citizen who applied before a vote started when counting RA votes.

I was mentioned in this story and I didn’t like it.

For

A

Delegate: < Abstain > Would you like to reopen nominations? < Yes> Vice Delegate: < Halsoni > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No > Speaker: < Matzerati > Would you like to reopen nominations? < Yes >

Then they would not be an eligible voter. But if the Speaker didn't process citizenship applications for five days then we got bigger problems.

Pallaith is a part of the cabal. We should not be giving them more control over our elections. No support.

Not sure why anyone would do this a whole month before the election. It would be start of May. 1. This is a cheap shot. 2. As many people have already explained, people are already able to do this under the current laws, the most this change would do is give candidates one more day or so to get...

Realistically it gives candidates about one more day to do what you described, in comparison to existing laws. Hardly opening the floodgates.

None of this is something that couldn’t already happen under the current laws. That’s the argument Sil is making.

Picairn, your opponent spends a great deal of his platform talking about the lack of activity in the executive staff and how he wants to address it. Obviously, you also recognise that the problem exists, but you don't seem to have placed as much of a focus on it. Whatever obstacles you...