Search results

If this repeal passes, your nation will still have to enforce a ban on conversion therapy.

Happy to answer any questions you may have about this repeal, as ever

Lizzie Two does not need to give everyone the sack in order to be almost universally noted in the news media and elsewhere - she needs only give someone the sack.

GA#91.

Is everybody saying "Against" without providing any further explanation in agreement with simone_republic or do they just have other concerns? :P

Incorrect.

What's the difference between voluntarily seeking hormone therapy and literally being tortured into renouncing one's status as a trans person? There is the answer.

owo

Ineligible to vote. I will note, however, that... ...the PWAA does not necessarily require member states to allow for disposable, used masks and gloves to be recycled any more than it requires members to ensure that service areas are placed at twenty-mile intervals on all of their motorways; it...

The author of this proposal does not support the Green New Deal.

Ineligible to vote but happy to answer any questions people may have about this proposal.

To avoid confusion.

Jedinsto is correct. RE Hulldom's other concern: People usually associate corporal punishment with the punishment of children so that is the theme I have chosen to roll with here :P

Ineligible to vote but happy to answer any questions about this proposal.

I do not believe that the circumstances I have highlighted in bold constitute "requir[ing] individuals to wear any item of clothing solely as a consequence of their possessing or not possessing an arbitrary and reductive characteristic," merely as a consequence of their being an actor (which -...

Section 7.4, Clause 21 of the Legal Code requires that no player's "name, IP address, physical address or location, phone number, place of employment or education, appearance, social media accounts[,] health status, both mental and physical; financial status; personal tragedies; changes in...

Given the recent recommendation, why does this thread title appear to suggest that TNP supports my proposal? I'd be grateful if they did but alas :P

Nation: Unknown Sun I pledge loyalty to The North Pacific, obedience to her laws, and responsible action as a member of her society. I pledge to only register one nation to vote in The North Pacific. I pledge that no nation under my control will wage war against the North Pacific. I understand...

Article 3 of GA#436 "[p]rohibits member states from hindering the right of individuals to free expression, excepting [...] restrictions permitted in future, unrepealed WA legislation." This means that future acts of international law could be enacted that would require nations to ban clothing...

As is the form, ineligible to vote but happy to answer any questions you might have about this proposal.

You cannot be banned from voting because you have been punished for a crime Imprisonment is punishment for a crime, therefore you cannot be banned from voting because you have been imprisoned If disenfranchisement is punishment for a crime, then you cannot be banned from voting because you have...

inb4 "But where's the replacement?" (am ineligible to vote)

Thanks, LOL. Thanks, LOL... again. I think we'll have to wait a few weeks for that to happen, technically :P

Ineligible to vote but always happy to answer any questions you may have about this, as is the usual form.

Molopovia has reassured me that he will "[d]efinitely" draft his proposal forumside upon its (now seemingly inevitable) defeat.

Ineligible to vote. What is stopping member governments from calling groups that they do not like threats to their "national security?"

GA#419.3 "[r]eserves for member nations the liberty to legislate on the issue of enfranchisement for individuals under incarceration." It is therefore impossible for a future resolution which would require member states to allow those currently imprisoned to vote on an equal basis with those who...

Ineligible and (for other, extremely obvious reasons) unwilling to vote - but more than happy to answer any questions about the proposal itself.

Abandoned - please lock this thread

A simple reading of this clause will reveal that member states need only "ensure... convenient[...] access" to the relevant "assistive technologies, housing programs, and mental health support services" for their inhabitants with disabilities. Such facilitation is not "too expensive for...