Search results

I would like to motion this bill to a vote - cheers in advance, Oracle.

Bill name changed from the Eliminating Annoying Red Tape so the Happiness of Workers Overseeing our Region is Maintained (EARTHWORM) Act. I have made one change, to propose that the title of Section 5.5 be updated to include a colon... pedantic, I know, but needs must :P If everybody else likes...

Does anybody have any more thoughts on my bill?

NON-WA for. If TNP don't want a resolution requiring all member states to enact and enforce measures to protect the health and safety of workers, then they can learn to live without a resolution requiring all member states to decriminalise drugs.

This proposal does not "abolish gender specific competitions in sports."

Any particular reason(s)? :P

The same thing that happens to them now, in the absence of Transgender Self-Determination as an active resolution. Except in school sports days.

"HAGHAST" is likely not a typo; if it were, Vara would be unable to spell out "NO SHIELDS" with the first letters of his proposal.

I resubmitted this proposal at exactly the same time that BC posted this thread. You can find the text of that proposal here.

Wrong. Article a would reserve to member states whether to legalise, decriminalise, or forbid the use (etc.) of any recreational drug, and forbid WA interference in these matters. Article b is non-binding. No comment.

Speaker: 1. Bobberino 2. Fregerson

I am still interested in this bill. (Not motioning for vote at this stage. My apologies if bumping is not proper behaviour in the Assembly :P)

Is this R4E being filed on the basis that it constitutes a "subsequent appointment[] to the same office" that Boston Castle was appointed to as a result of Robespierre's R4E (the Ministry for WA Affairs)?

1. Improvement of what? 2. How is your experience in a puppet storage with five residents, five embassies, five RMB posts, and almost no proper government going to be helpful in how you would administrate your duties as a Speaker?

Delegate: 1. St George 2. Comfed 3. MTdemocracy 4. Dreadton Would you like to reopen nominations? No Vice Delegate: 1. Lord Dominator 2. Sir Kasto 3. Blue Wolf II Would you like to reopen nominations? No [[Speaker: Venicea Would you like to reopen nominations? No

What would you do if your hand-picked defenders decided to grief TNP, a founderless region? What if they decided to grief a founderless region - such as TRR or Stargate - with which TNP is allied?

Banana agrees. I am rather astonished that MoWAA is recommending a vote against this proposal - despite the fact that GC's non-WA vote is the only AGAINST vote in the entire thread.

This proposal contains adequate detail about Maowi's work in Europeia, odd jobs in a couple of other regions, and contributions to the World Assembly. How can you read all of that and then claim that you "don't know the backstory?"

I agree. The main effect of this act would be to clarify that no personal information about anybody on NS may be distributed through an FoI request, or via the disclosure of Security Council records, without their consent (not just information concerning their "name, IP address, physical address...

Wrong. See Article d.

I will likely withdraw and redraft this proposal (on the NS forums) if it is not marked illegal.

As I said on the onsite thread, Halo quit the WA about two weeks after signing the CIAP, has not rejoined since, and thus - for all intents and purposes - his noncompliance with certain resolutions is arguably "moot" even by Administrative Compliance Act standards.

@Fregerson (pinging you so that I don't end up having to muddle about with multiple quote boxes) - the aim of Article a(i) is to ensure that freedom of conscience, a right that is distinct from freedom of expression, is protected in all circumstances by the World Assembly. Freedom of conscience...

My proposal does not do what you think it does :P

No pressure, this isn't going to be voted on for another two weeks LOL

Is me not including a Cardi B reference in my proposal really the biggest factor behind your opposition? :P

Normally I'd say I'd be "happy to answer any of your questions about this proposal" but it looks like I'll have to actually be asking the questions instead... could you not just file a legality challenge if you are sufficiently concerned about category and metagaming, for example? TNP has...

Author - happy to answer your questions about this (and to see actually new people manning the MoWAA vote thread deck :P).

I am seriously concerned at Article 3's requirement that member states impose sanctions upon non-members for failing to comply with international laws that they are not even bound by.

You live in a region. Do you think it's a great one?