Search results

Disaster Precautions And Responses Category: International Security | Strength: Mild Proposed by: Morover | Onsite Topic Note: Only votes from TNP WA nations and NPA personnel will be counted. If you do not meet these requirements, please add (non-WA) or something of that effect to your...

Regardless of one's actual opinion on whether exceptions should be able to be made, the fact that they are now able to do so leads us naturally to approve this. I cannot imagine a world in which this does not pass, but I vocalize my support regardless.

The pull event is now over! With 21 pulls total, it seems like it was a massive success! Thank you to everyone who nominated cards and voted, and an extra-special thank you to @9003 for actually performing the event and @Rom for volunteering their copy of Feux for the event! See you all next time.

Voting is closed. After reviewing the valid votes, the cards leadership and I have decided that Season 1 Feux will be the card for this pull event! Thank you to everyone who nominated and voted. Just a reminder that the pull event will be occurring at 3pm EST tomorrow!

For

As of now, the nomination period has ended for this month's pull event; therefore, it's time for the Guild to select their desired cards! The following guidelines have been provided: The guild's leadership has narrowed down the selection to the following, due to current limitations in the...

Nominations are now closed. We will get a voting thread up early tomorrow. Thank you everyone for your nominations!

Only a few hours left to nominate! We have decided to schedule the pull event for 3pm EST on Saturday, August 7th. We’ll get the options for voting up tomorrow!

Hi folks! Welcome back to TNP-sponsored pull events, which I'm more than happy to continue! I know that it's especially late in July (1 hour left for me, in EST), but I'm still listing this under July so we can have one for August, as well! Due to posting this late, the pull event will be a bit...

Accepted!

Against

For

Opening Statements Hi, everyone. To those who don't know me, I'm Morover, and I'm the new Minister of Cards. I'll keep this short, but I would like to express my gratitude to Robespierre for this opportunity. My foremost priority is to get the giveaways and lotteries back up and running to at...

Thank you for this appointment and I will deliver the responsibilities of the office to the utmost of my ability.

I, Morover, do hereby solemnly swear that during my term as Minister of Cards, I will uphold the ideals of Democracy, Freedom, and Justice of The Region of The North Pacific. I will use the powers and rights granted to me through The North Pacific Constitution and Legal Code in a legal...

Abstain

Against

Present.

Tentative for.

Present. I agree with Praeceps but don't have too large an issue with it otherwise.

Present. Personally, I'm not a huge fan, but the attitude TUMS has gotten in the thread almost makes me want to support it out of spite.

Abstain.

For

For - a lot of people will be opposed because "the SC is a very serious place and joke proposals are bad" but I have never really agreed with that sentiment, and this is a history lesson, if anything. Also, side note, but I wish I asked BA to change the title. "Declaration on..." is even worse...

For

Yeah, I think you're right. I think it's worded in such a way that is somewhat unclear, but you managed to explain it to me in a way that, upon rereading it, makes more sense to me. I'm going to change my vote to "present" for this vote, because I'm not sure exactly how I feel following this...

Against, and will be writing a repeal if this passes. The flaw that just tears a hole through this proposal is the lack of any clause actually allowing the WABC to create the zone referenced throughout the proposal. There are still some things that the proposal will accomplish, but the bulk of...

I have to say, the definition here is something I find incredibly funny - whether that's a positive or a negative is another story entirely. I don't think that 105 should be perceived as preventing legislation on more specific disaster events. Overall, I think I'm for, unless some compelling...

Against

For, of course, and I'll be responding to stuff in this thread.