Recent content by walrus

fwiw, the proposal doesn't need to apply to body pillows or decorative pillows. the preamble addresses pillows that align your spine. these do not. as far as I'm concerned there is no health benefit from including these :P not what it does, it doesn't regulate how you sleep. it gives tips for...

For (non-WA), and let it be known I fully expected and agree with this repeal :P

Nay (non-WA).

Delegate: 1. St George 2. Lord Dominator 3. Unfortunately Damian Would you like to reopen nominations? No Vice Delegate: Gorundu Would you like to reopen nominations? No Speaker: Abstain Would you like to reopen nominations? No

Against (non-WA), I'll copypaste my reasoning from TRR. Point 1: I disagree that member states can deny conflict journalists from getting conflict journalists' protections due to lacking an employment contract because they'd still be employed in providing journalism by a colorable...

Based? wtf

what a nightmare Against (non-WA)

What are you even talking about anymore? I specifically said that businesses wouldn't be forced to die if they could escape bankruptcy by firing a worker returning from paid leave. Yes, the fired employee is put out of a job. That's how the economy works.

Small businesses don't have to pay financial compensation under this resolution. The only thing they'd have to pay is employee benefits (which they'd already be paying, and in fact not all of them), and if they wouldn't die out, an acceptable job for the employee.

1) Yes. Yes, it does. If it didn't, the business would go bankrupt and the employee would be axed regardless. This is a nothing concern. 2) Because it's temporary? I almost expected better from you. Almost.

Where the democracy is strong, but apparently not as strong as Cretox's cult of personality.

For (non-wa) :>

It was already reserved to member states without any legislation like this. The "it's non-binding" argument is also invalid in a mild resolution. All of this is non-binding, really.

Speaker: 1. < Bobberino > 2. < Skaraborg > 3. < Oracle > 4. < Fregerson > 5. < Nubt II >

Against (non-WA) Subclause a accomplishes nothing. Subclause b isn't in the World Assembly's jurisdiction imo. Subclause c? Ehh. I don't think I want 2/3s of a resolution to be useless.