Recent content by saintpeter

Can the following be implemented: https://forum.thenorthpacific.org/topic/9049939/post-10404618 Thank you.

The Court, by unanimous consent of its Justices, has altered the Court Procedures. Added to the Procedures is the following clause— This clause will be clause 7 of section 2 of chapter 1.

Voting is over, then. I shall make an announcement later today.

I guess we need to do some formal vote. Voting period is 48 hours or when all Justices shall have voted, whichever is earlier. At vote is the motion to add clause 7 of section 2 of chapter 1, which will read: I vote Aye.

I was thinking of appointing at the start of each term, with the benefit of not adding extra chaos to court trials with new clerk appointments. Though I would be fine with the other option as well. This may work nicely with the bar exam, where anyone that's passed the bar exam can apply for...

> The Moderating Justice will endeavor to ensure all necessary court documents and processes are provided and completed by all parties prior to ending a trial. If any party has presented incomplete evidence or has neglected a necessary step in the trial process, the Moderating Justice may extend...

Delegate: 1. Nimarya 2. Robespierre 3. 2 and 2 is Fish Would you like to reopen nominations? No Vice Delegate: Cretox State Would you like to reopen nominations? No Speaker: East Isles Would you like to reopen nominations? No

I have previously publicly discussed this idea. Essentially, the court would appoint one or more clerks – probably starting with one – that would have the following tasks and responsibilities: * Allowed access to private justice spaces. * Helps with the drafting process. * Is allowed to present...

Would this work?

Alright. So from what I gather, the preference is a modification making explicit the Court’s power to make changes to the schedule at any time if it sees so necessary. I’ll get out an exact text tomorrow.

I propose to add a clause like the one below to Chapter 1, Section 2 of the Court Procedures: This should fix the whole “They’re guilty but they forgot to send this specific piece of evidence so never mind” thing.

1

I dislike the death penalty, so I'm For.

Dreadton has proposed to me developing a bar exam. It would be a four part test, the basic outline of which is described here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1scR2qTawvA9E1K8mLFiiWwmpeKloka3OZbdFP41tzh0/edit?usp=sharing It might be wort using when we put out a call for THOs/attorneys, which...

sign me up