Recent content by St George

Delegate: 1. < Abstain > Would you like to reopen nominations? < Yes > Vice Delegate: < Chipoli > Would you like to reopen nominations? < Yes > Speaker: < Foskeburg > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

Against due to the name, otherwise in support. Yes, I am zero fun at parties.

No.

Former multi-term Speaker here. I was never hamstrung by the two legislative vote limit and it was never a problem. Spreading out votes across a longer period of time encourages good legislative practice anyway.

Against this, I don't think there's a clear benefit to changing how things work right now and I'd rather not overburden the Speakers Office with having to track and count a great many legislative votes at any one time.

Hype

As someone who heavily pushed for declassification at various times, it's clear that that was a mistake and rather than improving transparency, it's just become a bureaucratic millstone around the neck of the executive. Full support.

Why the 7th of April?

How dare you come up with a reasonable solution to an issue someone has pointed out and also depriving me of a frankly quite boring talking point given that I've said it approximately 4,000 times over the years. Full support. And exile. Twice.

Good luck Ruben.

As a note for those who aren't on the discord where this was already discussed - the Three Times You're Out Amendment did not need the delegate's signature, nor was the delegate able to Veto it, as it was a constitutional amendment.

Non-WA Against it's a shame to see so many people supporting a commendation of someone who invaded one of our treatied allies and has spent their entire career engaging in negative, malevolent actions on NS.

Justice: 1. Abstain Would you like to reopen nominations? Yes

I'm not sure it's so much me feeling tense as it is me seeing how tense quite a few people's interactions seem to have gotten. But maybe I'm reading too much into things.

Which no one has ever done, is doing or will ever do. Got an actual argument?