Security Council Adjustment Act

Sil Dorsett

Sil Dorsett

The Belt Collector
-
-
Deputy Speaker
-
-
-
-
TNP Nation
sil_dorsett
I think it's clear that the Frontiers/Strongholds update has, albeit slowly, had an effect on our ability to hold a strong total population. By consequence, WA endorsements are down, and we've reached the point where our Security Councilors are suffering. It's time for an adjustment.

Section 5.1 of the Legal Code is amended to read as follows:
Section 5.1: Requirements and Admission
4. Any person with an account on the regional forum and a nation in The North Pacific may apply to join the Council, as long as their nation satisfies any influence and endorsement requirements for membership. Any applicant who does not meet the appropriate requirements, or who ceases to meet them, is automatically rejected.
5. Security Councilors must meet the same influence and endorsement requirements as applicants to the Council, and may be suspended or removed if they fail to do so.
6. The influence requirement is a Soft Power Disbursement Rating within The North Pacific greater than or equal to 144,000, or an influence rank within The North Pacific greater than or equal to Apprentice, whichever is lower. The endorsement requirement is at least 400, or 50 percent of the Serving Delegate's endorsement count, whichever is lower.
7. By a two-thirds majority vote, the Security Council may exempt nations who have expended their influence in service to the region from any influence requirements to join the Council or to remain a member. Exemptions granted in such a manner remain valid until the exempted nation regains the required influence level.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Section 5.1: Requirements and Admission
4. Any person with an account on the regional forum and a nation in The North Pacific may apply to join the Council, as long as their nation satisfies any influence and endorsement requirements for membership. Any applicant who does not meet the appropriate requirements, or who ceases to meet them, is automatically rejected.
5. Security Councilors must meet the same influence and endorsement requirements as applicants to the Council, and may be suspended or removed if they fail to do so.
6. The influence requirement is a Soft Power Disbursement Rating within The North Pacific greater than or equal to 182,500144,000, or an influence rank within The North Pacific greater than or equal to Apprentice, whichever is lower. The endorsement requirement is at least 5400, or 50 percent of the Serving Delegate's endorsement count, whichever is lower.
7. By a two-thirds majority vote, the Security Council may exempt nations who have expended their influence in service to the region from any influence requirements to join the Council or to remain a member. Exemptions granted in such a manner remain valid until the exempted nation regains the required influence level.

(144,000 Influence points is 400 endorsements for 180 days.)
 
Last edited:
How many WA members do we currently have? Can we see the number of members, or is it an estimate?

For example;
WA members: 1000
Endorsement requirement is at least (now): 400

Rate for the law: (400/1000) x 100 = %40
 
Sil Dorsett:
You show me the math and I'll consider it.
Click to expand...
I think it makes sense to go off total number of WAs in the region, there is little point in a fixed number as this can either improve or worsen over time. This is currently 776, so 400 is approximately 51.5% of our total WA count. However, setting such a high static percentage of WA count as the requirement makes it obsolete because delegate endorsements will always be lower than total WA count. Alternatively, the requirement as measured by delegate endorsement count can be a higher percentage. If you set it at 62.5% the two (WA population times 50%) are equal at 80% delegate endorsement percentage, which from what I've seen anecdotally is pretty good for a GCR, Ruben is currently at 81% and for reference Sporaltryus is at 77%.

With regards to the influence requirement, you can basically just set your resulting endorsement count from the first equation times 360. However, I think in any case this will be a more strenuous requirement than either endorsement requirement because it effectively requires someone maintain that for 180 days.

Ultimately it's up to you, and you know what would be reasonable better than I do.
 
After thinking about this some more, the problem with a floating requirement is the possibility of a Drew Durnil-style uptick in NationStates activity causing SCers to suddenly no longer qualify for membership due to increased attention from a YouTube or TikTok video. That completely ruins my intention. My intent is solely to acknowledge that getting to and maintaining 500 / 182,500 is incredibly tough now because of the F/S update.

I think setting a static value is the correct approach. So, I'm sticking with what I've got for now, though I'm willing to entertain alternative static values.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top