Gorundu for Vice Delegate (once again): Focused on the Job

Gorundu

I finished my Chinese homework
-
Pronouns
he/him
TNP Nation
Gorundu
Gorundu For Vice Delegate (once again)
Focused on the Job

Hi, some of you will probably be surprised to see me throw my hat in the ring for this election. So why am I running? To put it simply, I want to see a stronger focus on the important things. With our endorsement counts and WA membership running low due to the effect of the Frontiers update, the Vice Delegate’s focus should be on finding strategies to maximise those numbers as much as possible. Although we may never again reach those 1000+ endorsements of our glory days, we have some clear room for improvement, and I believe we can get there with a dedicated effort.

Now, I’m sure this will be a question on some of your minds, so I’ll begin by addressing my own baggage head-on. Those who remember will know that in my last elected position, as Delegate, my term ended very poorly, largely due to my inability to juggle my real-life priorities along with the duties of the Delegacy, as well as several foreign affairs messes that dealt a high level of stress to me. These circumstances led to my failure to act as an effective leader for the region as a whole and for my Cabinet in particular, and ultimately losing the trust that the people of this region had placed in me.

But I don’t think it’s fair to define me or my legacy based on that short period of just over a month. This time round, I’m running to return to a less stressful position and one where I have already served capably before. Neither the circumstances I’m facing in real life or the demands of the position I’m running for are similar to what I encountered as Delegate, and I hope that my history of serving this region in all sorts of government positions, including as Vice Delegate, will be enough for the voters to place their trust in me for this election.

With that out of the way, let’s get into what my plans are as Vice Delegate.

The Basics

The basic duties of the office are simple but of course necessary - so here’s a brief look at how I’ll be doing them

Endorsements - Right now I already have the most endorsements in the region outside of the Security Council, and that’s without me even having endorsed all nations in the region. In fact, I am currently not endorsing about 100 WA nations (nearly 10%) because if I did, I would have exceeded the endorsement counts of some Security Councilors. If I am elected, reaching second place in endorsements should be guaranteed and hopefully would be speedy as well.
Vice Delegate checks - I was efficient in conducting these checks last time I was Delegate and never let any checks get close to lapsing the 7-day limit. If I have any doubts about any applicants, I will err on the side of caution and discuss these doubts with the Security Council.

Updates and Reporting

In my previous term, I was largely successful in providing detailed weekly updates to the region. The reporting situation from the current Vice Delegate is less than ideal, with an average of two weeks between reports, including a whole one month gap with no reports. If elected, my intention is to return to delivering regular and timely weekly updates, including information on statistics, endorsement alert and telegrams/dispatches set out, declassification, Security Council proceedings, and more.

The Big Question: Growing our WA numbers

As I alluded to in the introduction, my core focus for this term would be on growing the region’s WA membership numbers and endorsement counts. There’s a few ways on how I think we could achieve that.

Endorsement event

Endorsement events used to be a semi-regular feature in TNP - essentially they were intensive short-term drives to get people to endorse more over a period of a week or two. One of these events even helped us reach number 1 in the world in terms of average WA endorsements. Given that we haven’t had one of these events in a couple of years, this will probably be a good time for such an event to make an impact. To make the most of it, we will need to cover all our bases, with custom telegrams, dispatches, ideally some graphics, and engagement on the Regional Message Board. With our endorsement-related tools not quite up to the level they were at before our original scripts stopped working, there might be some challenges with using and presenting statistics for the event, but I’m confident we can devise solutions that allow us to set numerical goals and keep track of the progress.

Improving engagement with the WADP

Thanks to efforts mostly from Kaschovia and Sil Dorsett in restoring the functions of our treasured WADP, we are once again publishing rewards for our endorsers and sending out card lottery prizes. That said, the work isn’t all done and dusted, and given that a lot of the program was non-functional for well over a year, there’s still work to be done in boosting awareness.

I will be aiming to identify achievable strategies to get the WADP to a better place and get more people engaging with them. There’s already been some recent discussion on how to best ensure new nations get introduced to the WA and endotarting, and one devastatingly simple thing to do is to just ping new WA nations on the RMB - a ping from the Vice Delegate might be the thing that catches someone’s attention. In a similar vein, another potential way to create more frequent engagement with the WADP is perhaps to recognise endotarters not just through the monthly awards, but on a more frequent basis through RMB posts or dispatch/telegram shoutouts to create a bit more hype and awareness about the program.

On the card lottery front, I believe we haven’t had a proper effort at promoting it since the heyday of the cards minigame several years ago, and at this point with it having been paused for almost two years, it might just no longer be on many people’s minds. I intend on giving the lottery a more prominent place in WADP resources and especially emphasise that it could help you get a coveted gold badge for deck value. While the allure of trading cards isn’t the same for everyone, it is one of the most tangible prizes we can give and a good attention-grabber if we promote it well.

More things you might be curious about

Relationship with the Delegate and Executive

This term had been unusual in that the Vice Delegate very much acted almost like a deputy to the Delegate, though this was later separately defined during the term as a Chief of Staff position. While the relationship between a Delegate and Vice Delegate will always depend on the specific individuals who occupy the positions, I won’t be expecting to play an outsized role in the executive government or taking on management of the Cabinet or the Executive Staff. That said, I very much look forward to a collaborative relationship with the Delegate as there will naturally be overlaps in our agendas, especially around engagement with new nations, so that makes the Ministry of Home Affairs an especially relevant body to cooperate with. I also hope to help out when I can, whether it’s lending advice, being a part of big projects, or just regular staff work.

More relevant to the role of the Vice Delegate as the chief security officer of the region, I have been part of the Foreign Affairs Committee since its inception a year ago, which gives me excellent insight into potential foreign threats the region might face, and if elected Vice Delegate, this will provide a valuable line of communication on security threats between the Executive and the Security Council.

Transparency and Declassification

An often under-the-radar issue, the Security Council’s declassification efforts are strong in some places but weaker in others. The release of classified forum threads is mostly up to date, while the legal obligation to similarly release Discord logs seems to have fallen to the wayside. As Vice Delegate, I intend to take the lead on this task and get the ball rolling on reviewing and redacting logs as necessary, working with the Security Council to get them ready for release. It’s not just about meeting the legal obligations - it’s also something that gives citizens more insight into what the Security Council does and how it monitors the region’s security, which will allow them to place more trust in the institution.

Conclusion

I’m running for Vice Delegate because I believe this is a time we need a strong focus on improving the region’s endorsement levels, and I have a plan to achieve that. My history shows that being Vice Delegate is a job I can do well, and it’s a job I would like to return to so I can make it even better.

As always, I anticipate your questions and will do my best to answer them.
 
Last edited:
What steps will you take to ensure that a larger number of trusted people are able to operate the WADP?
 
My primary concern as a voter this election with respect to the Vice Delegate's office is an increase in transparency with respect to the security situation in the North; as someone formerly in government I feel the electorate should have been better informed and prepared for the post-F&S decline in WA power in TNP.

I ask the same questions to both you and the incumbent:
How would you communicate what I (and I think many TNPers) view as the inevitable long-term decline in WA power and its associated benefits (e.g., influence, delegate votes)?
Furthermore, how will you seek to change government messaging, both internal and external, on this critical issue?
 
Wow, beautiful and amazing campaign. Just like your hair.

A couple of questions:

A) Did you support the Labor Party at this week’s federal election?
B) What is Halsoni’s worst trait?
C) Do you think the Security Council is currently serving its purpose?
D) Who is the most effective Security Councillor currently?
E) In respect to citizenship applications, particularly rejecting them, would you seek counsel from the SC, the cabinet etc on this? And if so, why.
 
Thank you all for the questions so far!
What steps will you take to ensure that a larger number of trusted people are able to operate the WADP?
As you can see, I've spent a substantial portion of my platform discussing the WADP, and if I am elected, I see myself spending some time to really understand the current state of WADP scripts, the limitations, and the progress that's being made. As I understand it, right now access to scripts are limited to the script authors themselves - Kasch for the awards scripts and Sil for the cards lottery scripts. I would suspect it might be because the scripts aren't currently very user-friendly for non-coders, as the priority would have been to restore them as soon as possible rather than user-friendliness. If elected, I intend to check out these scripts myself and see if there is a way for me to use them without being too technologically-inclined. If this works, then we can expand acccess to the wider Security Council, who might be able to assist during busy times or absences.
My primary concern as a voter this election with respect to the Vice Delegate's office is an increase in transparency with respect to the security situation in the North; as someone formerly in government I feel the electorate should have been better informed and prepared for the post-F&S decline in WA power in TNP.

I ask the same questions to both you and the incumbent:
How would you communicate what I (and I think many TNPers) view as the inevitable long-term decline in WA power and its associated benefits (e.g., influence, delegate votes)?
Furthermore, how will you seek to change government messaging, both internal and external, on this critical issue?
I thought your concern was somewhat odd at first, because I believed that most people who are somewhat active in the game would be aware of the effect of the update, and the far more important issue is how we get people to engage more with the WA and endorsements in light of our decline in WA power. However, I recalled that a while ago I had sent some endorsement telegrams referencing our decline in WA power as a reason why people should start endotarting, and one of the replies I received took it as an indication that it was because the government was performing poorly. So perhaps there are still a good number of people out there who are confused why our endorsements have dropped so much or how we have been disadvantaged significantly by the update.

Although we could just add context about the update in our WADP dispatches, we would need to be careful not to distract from the core messages of the WADP and potentially generate more confusion. A likely better way to generate more awareness about our WA power decline would be tied it to a special endorsement event as I've proposed, using our unfortunate decline in WA power as motivation for everyone to contribute more for the region by raising our endorsement counts. Beyond just special events, the general government messaging should stress unity and cooperation - a reversal of fortunes will only happen when everyone works together and contributes to that goal. This messaging should be reinforced through all the usual mediums (telegrams, dispatches, RMB posts, WFE) whenever we ask people to endorse and share endorsements. To go even further for those who are interested in learning more, we could even elaborate on our thinking with numbers, analysis, historical comparisons and comparisons to other regions, which could all be done in the form of a TNS article, for example.
Wow, beautiful and amazing campaign. Just like your hair.
Thanks, the perm was very cheap in China
A) Did you support the Labor Party at this week’s federal election?
Yes
B) What is Halsoni’s worst trait?
He's Dutch
C) Do you think the Security Council is currently serving its purpose?
Our Security Councilors are all maintaining high endorsement counts and influence, which is the primary method of keeping our region safe from foreign invaders or rogue actors. So yes, the Security Council is serving its purpose in keeping the region secure. While individual councilors can all have different circumstances and and could even become inactive, the Security Council as a collective is doing its job of maintaining our regional security.
D) Who is the most effective Security Councillor currently?
The Security Council acts collectively rather than as individuals in ensuring our region's safety, and for that reason it doesn't make sense to me to single out one person as the "most effective" Security Councillor. That said, Security Councilors do bring their own expertise and experience into the role, and there are some who I believe particularly offer unique contributions. The first one is Marcus (Ethnon), who is one of the very few (and currently only) Security Councilor to be highly active on the RMB. The respect he enjoys from the RMB community would be invaluable during possible security crises, as the RMB community could play an important role in events such as coups. Another one is Sil, who has done much to restore some of the tools the Vice Delegate and Security Council used to have at their disposal to promote endorsements. Without his efforts, recovering some of our lost WA members and endorsements would be much harder.
E) In respect to citizenship applications, particularly rejecting them, would you seek counsel from the SC, the cabinet etc on this? And if so, why.
I would discuss with the Security Council whenever there is cause for concern for a citizenship applicant - being a large body consisting of some of the region's oldest and most respected members, there is much expertise and experience available within the council to help me make an informed decision. I would also definitely seek counsel from the SC before rejecting any applicants, as it is a process that older Security Councilors would have more experience with than me. I would also inform the Delegate if I am thinking of rejecting an applicant, as often these rejections could have foreign affairs implications. It would be up to the Delegate who they want to share the information with, whether it could be the Cabinet, or the Foreign Affairs Committee, or just a select few individuals.
 
Will you commit to tarting daily?

Regarding transparency, I want someone in the VD seat with a plan for declassification. This is the work that directly affects me, and requires a not insignificant time commitment on my part. The backlog on discord is over 600 pages. Tackling it would best be done methodically and predictably. I will commit to help. Tell me you can commit to regularly preparing 50 pages a week for the SC to review, after which you will then release the information to the public.
 
Will you commit to tarting daily?
Definitely. Daily tarting probably takes around 5 minutes on average so it's easily doable.
Regarding transparency, I want someone in the VD seat with a plan for declassification. This is the work that directly affects me, and requires a not insignificant time commitment on my part. The backlog on discord is over 600 pages. Tackling it would best be done methodically and predictably. I will commit to help. Tell me you can commit to regularly preparing 50 pages a week for the SC to review, after which you will then release the information to the public.
Realistically I think it's hard for anyone to commit to maintaining a regular and high pace of reviewing and redacting logs. I'm not sure if the pages you're referencing is the pages that show up when you use the Discord search function, in which case there's 25 messages per page - which means 1250 messages in 50 pages. I can commit to preparing material for review weekly, but I don't know if 50 pages is a target I can hit because I don't know how much of that is stuff I'll need to pause and consider redacting.
 
In a Word doc there are about 8-10 messages per page. I wouldn't expect it to take more than a couple of hours a week. Including getting input from council members. If you are in doubt about specific redactions, leave them in and one of us will flag it.

You are frequently critical, and rightly so, when there is a lack of transparency in the government. The SC discord logs are one area where the Vice Delegate has the power to fix the problem. If you can commit to putting in 2 hours a week on the project, I will vote for you.
 
In a Word doc there are about 8-10 messages per page. I wouldn't expect it to take more than a couple of hours a week. Including getting input from council members. If you are in doubt about specific redactions, leave them in and one of us will flag it.

You are frequently critical, and rightly so, when there is a lack of transparency in the government. The SC discord logs are one area where the Vice Delegate has the power to fix the problem. If you can commit to putting in 2 hours a week on the project, I will vote for you.
Right, I see. I think 2 hours a week is a reasonable time to put towards declassification and I can commit to that. You're certainly right that I've tended to be critical when I've perceived there to be a lack of transparency, so I'll definitely do my part to correct that if elected.
 
Back
Top