- Pronouns
- He/Him
Looks like we've got a new R4R from the Court Examiner. Anyone fancy being moderating justice?
[Private] R4R Regarding "On the Need for Further Clarification on Restarting Voting Periods"
- Thread starter Wymondham
- Start date
- Pronouns
- he/him/his
- TNP Nation
- Zemnaya Svoboda
- Discord
- Eluvatar#8517
I do not, at this time.
I’d be cool with being moderating justice
- Pronouns
- He/Him
Happy for you to go ahead and accept it then
I do believe it is deliberation time then
- Pronouns
- he/him/his
- TNP Nation
- Zemnaya Svoboda
- Discord
- Eluvatar#8517
Happy to accept the court examiner's argument and strike the guidelines segment of the ruling in question.
I would agree as well
The Court opines the following:
On Standing
The petitioner is the Court Examiner, and enjoys universal standing for all questions before this Court.
The Prior Ruling
The Court has been asked to review its old ruling “On the Need for Further Clarification on Restarting Voting Periods,” in light of the region’s subsequent codification of further Election Commission law in the Legal Code. The given ruling also includes a section that has not been challenged and deals with how abstentions are counted in elections.
Holding
As the Regional Assembly has seen fit to specifically legislate the bounds of Election Commission activity and in consideration of the Court’s own prior ruling “On Resolving Ambiguity in the Absence of Subordinate Rules for Government Bodies” and rendered the guidelines portion of the prior ruling obsolete, that portion will be struck out. The abstention portion of the ruling remains in force, while the struck out guidelines will remain present for historical interest.
On Standing
The petitioner is the Court Examiner, and enjoys universal standing for all questions before this Court.
The Prior Ruling
The Court has been asked to review its old ruling “On the Need for Further Clarification on Restarting Voting Periods,” in light of the region’s subsequent codification of further Election Commission law in the Legal Code. The given ruling also includes a section that has not been challenged and deals with how abstentions are counted in elections.
Holding
As the Regional Assembly has seen fit to specifically legislate the bounds of Election Commission activity and in consideration of the Court’s own prior ruling “On Resolving Ambiguity in the Absence of Subordinate Rules for Government Bodies” and rendered the guidelines portion of the prior ruling obsolete, that portion will be struck out. The abstention portion of the ruling remains in force, while the struck out guidelines will remain present for historical interest.
- Pronouns
- he/him/his
- TNP Nation
- Zemnaya Svoboda
- Discord
- Eluvatar#8517
Looks great!
Actually posted it, would one of you mind putting it in the rulings thread so I don't have to figure out table code?