[GA - Withdrawn] Universal Minimum Wage for Employees

Status
Not open for further replies.

AraFuttio

Also known as Oriaga/Catshoar
-
Pronouns
He/him
TNP Nation
Arawi
Discord
Catshoar
ga.jpg

Universal Minimum Wage for Employees
Category: Regulation | Area of Effect: Labour Rights
Proposed by Albeville, co-authored by Namwenia, and Tinhampton | Onsite Topic



The World Assembly,

Recognizing previous efforts by the World Assembly to protect the rights of labour and labourers including General Assembly Resolutions #43, #503, #543, #560, and #665 (the most recent of which is explicitly focused at guaranteeing minimum standard of living);

Concerned that, despite the above resolutions' work to protect a minimum standard of living in the abstract, the World Assembly does not require any employer - whether a small private business with a couple of employees or a state-owned behemoth with billions of workers at its command - to pay a minimum amount to its labourers, enabling them to disregard sapient persons' renumeration rights and broader personal interests;

Conscious of the fact that a concerning increase among employees whose remuneration rights are not respected require action in this regard;

Asserting that measures must be taken as soon as possible to deal with this ever-growing injustice of the labour market;

Hereby:
1. Defines "minimum wage" as the minimum wage or salary that should be guaranteed to workers by their employers,

2. Defines an "employee" as a sapient individual who by contract is obliged, for remuneration, to work under the employment and direction of an employer,

3. Further defines the poverty line in each member state as the average cost of materials or supplies necessary for the survival of a sapient individual in that member state (which shall, at minimum, include the costs of food, rent for a single-person dwelling and utilities for that dwelling),

4. Requires each member state to:
a. Calculate its poverty line annually,

b. Set a minimum wage for all employees on that basis which shall be above its poverty line at least over a full-time workweek (although nothing shall otherwise prevent the setting of different minimum wages for different occupations),

c. Pursue enforcement measures (including adequate sanctions, if needed) against any employer that fails to pay its employees that minimum wage, and

d. Provide financial support for employers that sincerely require its help with paying their employees the minimum wage, which shall be targeted solely towards such payment, through member state government funds and/or funding assistance provided by the WA General Fund.

Note: Only votes from TNP WA nations and NPA personnel will be counted. If you do not meet these requirements, please add (non-WA) or something of that effect to your vote.

Voting Instructions:
  • Vote For if you want the Delegate to vote For the resolution.
  • Vote Against if you want the Delegate to vote Against the resolution.
  • Vote Abstain if you want the Delegate to abstain from voting on this resolution.
  • Vote Present if you are personally abstaining from this vote.
Detailed opinions with your vote are appreciated and encouraged!

ForAgainstAbstainPresent
1510
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Against. It's a left wing (using the American definition) job destroying resolution that will hurt the middle class and aspiring households.
 
Last edited:
Against. Overall I think a minimum wage is a good idea but I am also concerned about 4d since there are no criteria for what constitutes "...employers that seriously require its help..." Emphasis added. Does this mean I could start a company with no money or product/service to sell and get the government to pay a minimum wage to people I classify as employees (myself included)? Or another nation could have businesses that do this and then try to take finds from the WA General Fund. Seems like this might be ripe for abuse and should be better defined or possibly removed entirely.
 
How will it do this? See eg Card and Krueger or Dube-Lester-Reich for why it isn't "job destroying".

For.

I digress, but see the roughly tens of thousands economists who write more libertarian papers on why it is.
 
Last edited:
For

I see no issues with the sentiment nor goal, though I feel it doesn't go far enough and leaves a fair amount of ambiguity.
 
Against. States deciding a minimum wage is a liberal feel-good policy to deaden worker power, taking it away the unions and co-opting progressive energy in favour of the existing system of exploitation.
 
This proposal has been withdrawn, and therefore this thread is to be locked.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top