[GA - Passed] Convention on Law Enforcement for Heinous Crimes

Status
Not open for further replies.

Magecastle

Wolf of the North
Pronouns
He/Him
TNP Nation
Magecastle Embassy Building A5
Discord
green_canine
ga.jpg

Convention on Law Enforcement for Heinous Crimes
Category: International Security | Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Magecastle Embassy Building A5 | Onsite Topic


Whereas, given the heinous nature of crimes against humanity and other similar acts, member nations should cooperate with each other to bring those responsible to justice; and

Whereas such cooperation is effectively promoted by facilitating comity between member nations in dealing with heinous crimes;

The World Assembly enacts as follows, subject to past World Assembly law still in force.
  1. For the purposes of this resolution, a "heinous crime" means an act which World Assembly law explicitly or implicitly designates as a war crime, a crime against peace, or a crime against humanity, regardless of what jurisdiction takes up a case regarding that act.

  2. Where an individual charged or convicted for a heinous crime in a World Assembly member nation remains under the jurisdiction of another member nation, the latter member nation must make a bona fide review to determine whether to extend comity over the case, if such comity is not already extended or to be extended. Such a review must be presided over by a court or other tribunal.
    1. In such a review, the tribunal must consider, at minimum, (i) any past trials of said individual for the heinous crime in question; (ii) the likelihood that the individual is guilty of the heinous crime; (iii) any state or public interests against or in favour of extending comity; and (iv) the nature of the relevant charges or conviction against the individual.

    2. The World Assembly Judiciary Committee may, with the consent of the reviewing member nation, supply judicial officials to participate in the tribunal or proceedings thereof.

  3. Comity may be extended either through the resumption or commencement of judicial proceedings against the individual in question for the relevant heinous crime; or through the extradition of the individual in question to the member nation which has charged or convicted the individual in question for said heinous crime.
    1. No member nation or entity therein may wilfully obstruct the transportation of an individual between member nation jurisdictions for the purposes of such extradition.

    2. The enforcement of a judicial sentence shall be considered a form of judicial proceedings in this resolution.

  4. The International Enforcement Commission, or IEC, is established. Where a member nation has elected to extend comity via extradition under Section 3, the IEC may supply armed defensive support, in the form of law enforcement officers and with the consent of the extraditing member nation, to facilitate the delivery of the extradited individual to the relevant member nation's jurisdiction. IEC officers acting per this mandate may use armed force only as necessary to ensure that the individual is safely delivered to the relevant member nation. The World Assembly shall reserve the power to, by resolution, expand the authority of the IEC to carry out additional law enforcement actions.
Note: Only votes from TNP WA nations and NPA personnel will be counted. If you do not meet these requirements, please add (non-WA) or something of that effect to your vote.
Voting Instructions:
  • Vote For if you want the Delegate to vote For the resolution.
  • Vote Against if you want the Delegate to vote Against the resolution.
  • Vote Abstain if you want the Delegate to abstain from voting on this resolution.
  • Vote Present if you are personally abstaining from this vote.
Detailed opinions with your vote are appreciated and encouraged!


ForAgainstAbstainPresent
11600
 
Last edited:
Overview
This proposal seeks to create a framework for member nations to collaborate in dealing with individuals accused or convicted of heinous crimes. If an individual is prosecuted or convicted of a terrible crime in one member nation but lives in another, the latter must conduct a review to determine whether to extend comity. The proposal also creates the International Enforcement Commission (IEC), which can provide military support for extradited individuals' delivery.

Recommendation
The creation of a framework for member nations to cooperate in dealing with heinous crimes such as war crimes, crimes against peace, or crimes against humanity is necessary to ensure those responsible are brought to justice. This proposal promotes collaboration and facilitates extradition or judicial proceedings against such individuals by requiring member nations to conduct a genuine review to determine whether to extend comity over the case of an individual charged or convicted of a heinous crime in another member nation. Along with this, the creation of the International Enforcement Commission (IEC) increases member nations' ability to collaborate in dealing with heinous crimes by providing armed support for the delivery of extradited persons.

For the above reasons, the Ministry of World Assembly Affairs recommends a vote For the current General Assembly proposal at vote, "Convention On Law Enforcement For Heinous Crimes".[/b][/b][/b][/b]
 
Last edited:
For. This proposal promotes international cooperation in bringing heinous crime perpetrators to justice, while also ensuring that the legal rights and interests of all parties involved are taken into consideration.
 
I made a few comments via DMs with the author and have no further comments. I have some reservations on the concept of comity but will back this. For.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top