[GA - WITHDRAWN] Repeal: "Volcanic Activity Convention"

Status
Not open for further replies.

Greater Cesnica

Resident
-
TNP Nation
Greater Nabeul
Discord
novemberstars#8888
ga.jpg

Repeal: “Volcanic Activity Convention”
Category: Repeal | GA #565
Proposed by: Magecastle Embassy Building A5 | Onsite Topic
Replacement: None​


General Assembly Resolution #565 “Volcanic Activity Convention” (Category: Regulation; Area of Effect: Safety) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

The World Assembly,

Believing
that it is indeed important there are strong measures in place to protecting member nations from volcanic activity, which poses a significant danger to many member nations, yet

Objecting to the resolution's self-professed "attempt" at this goal, as it stands in blissful ignorance of the metaphorically limp-wristed, overly restrictive, and burdensome nature of many of its mandates -- making it flawed to the point where repeal is imperative,

Convinced that it is in the interests of all member nations to clear the body of World Assembly law of dross that fails to actually achieve its ostensible goal while wasting member nation finances, especially when such legislation is now superfluous and redundant,

Finds as follows _
  • Vague and subjective language is open to abuse by delinquent member nations. For this reason, the resolution's most inoffensive mandates are easily exploitable and open to evasion, contradicting the resolution's aims. Terminology such as conditioning minimisation of damage to the environment as "reasonable", mandating distribution of "necessary" resources, and only requiring reversal of damage from volcanic activity "within reason", is extremely subjective and abusable; delinquent member nations can thus avoid these "duties" and fail to protect themselves from volcanic activity by, for example, refusing to distribute resources on the basis that they are not "necessary", or failing to reverse any more than minimal damage from volcanic activity on the grounds that it is not "within reason" to do so.

  • Further, Section 2b mandates that member nations at risk of volcanic activity "provid[e] aid to each other in an evacuation"; however, the resolution omits any explicit or implicit mandate whatsoever to prevent member nations from misusing such aid. Diversion very rarely occurs in public so as to give nations an opportunity to instead provide non-material aid in response to the diversion. As a result, this will open up a very likely possibility of a receiving nation misusing such aid -- eg diverting all financial aid to politicians' off-shore bank accounts -- but member nations that happen to be at risk of volcanic activity still being forced to throw money and resources to that nation en masse. Wasteful spending mechanisms reduce the amount of funds available for more important projects funded by member nations, including humanitarian aid for nations that actually require such aid. Member nations should not be allowed to dishonestly flush other member nations' funds down the toilet.

  • Repeal of the resolution eliminates no actual substantial protection in volcanic activity, as all of the resolution ultimately falls under the purview of "Humanitarian Aid Coordination", "Disaster Precautions and Responses" and "Emergency Broadcasting Standards", which more comprehensively and competently legislate on protections in all disasters -- including "cooperation between member nations when it comes to handling disasters" -- rather than narrowly only targetting one specific disaster event. This renders the "Volcanic Activity Convention" obsolete, such that it covers nothing original in World Assembly law, and its significant flaws outweigh any benefit it otherwise may have. Further, any flaws in these resolutions ought to be addressed by replacing them with similar omnibi, rather than only targetting an exceedingly narrow scope of any such flaws.
For these reasons, be the "Volcanic Activity Convention" repealed.
Note: Only votes from TNP WA nations and NPA personnel will be counted. If you do not meet these requirements, please add (non-WA) or something of that effect to your vote.
Voting Instructions:
  • Vote For if you want the Delegate to vote For the resolution.
  • Vote Against if you want the Delegate to vote Against the resolution.
  • Vote Abstain if you want the Delegate to abstain from voting on this resolution.
  • Vote Present if you are personally abstaining from this vote.
Detailed opinions with your vote are appreciated and encouraged!


ForAgainstAbstainPresent
0000
 
Last edited:
Against

The arguments are not strong enough to overturn IMO and this feels very much like it was written vaguely as an anti-refugee/anti-spending bill.
 
Against

None of the arguments raised here are very strong, and could easily be applied to any resolution addressing aid. The text itself is also not very well-written.
 
Against

None of the arguments raised here are very strong, and could easily be applied to any resolution addressing aid. The text itself is also not very well-written.
It is not true that this applies to any resolution addressing aid. It does not merely "address" aid -- it requires nations to provide humanitarian aid. In doing so, the resolution should implicitly ensure that the aid is actually used properly, or it would be rather burdensome on member nation finances. Further, GA#570 already ensures that member nations receive aid when they need it -- specifically, with the wording "Member-nations met with a financial burden as a result of this resolution are permitted to submit a request for aid to the WADB, which shall be evaluated and responded to promptly, with approval based on the level of demonstrable need for aid, at the discretion of the WADB". By applying only to nations "met with a financial burden as a result of [570]", it already implicitly ensures that the aid is not diverted, as it already would be necessary to comply with the rest of the resolution. On the other hand, 565 will establish a redundant mechanism requiring member nations that happen to be at risk of volcanic activity to provide aid "in an evacuation" to nations "likely to be significantly affected [by volcanic activity]", even if the receiving nation does not require such aid, and may as well divert it to some wasteful purpose. There is no implicit or explicit mechanism ensuring that member nation aid is not provided to corrupt nations, or to deter nations from doing so, either by only mandating it be provided to nations likely to divert it, or, (preferribly), prohibiting nations from diverting aid.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top