[SC - WITHDRAWN] Historical Region Act

Status
Not open for further replies.

Fregerson

Secretly here
-
-
TNP Nation
PotatoFarmers
Discord
Freg#0420
sc.jpg

Historical Region Act
Category: Declaration | Type: Declare
Proposed by: Lenlyvit | Onsite Topic


The Security Council,

Noting that throughout the NationStates Multiverse there are regions of truly ancient status that were founded in the time before founding nations held executive power amongst their peers, which happened to be between November 2002 and early April 2003;

Knowing that among this group of regions there are some that had one nation take executive powers over the region through many different means, including democratic elections and godly appointments, while a small minority of the group did not;

Naming the few regions thought to be the last of these truly ancient regions which have never had a founder nation lording over them to be Belgium, Bucketheadland, Carioch, Eutopia, EWU, Hattrick, Haven, Lake ilopango, Liberal Paradise, Secularia, Seven Eleven, South Pacific, The AGS Commonwealth, The Proletariat Coalition, The West, User Friendlia, NationStates, Canada, Middle Earth, St Abbaddon, Stargate, Yorkshire, Space, and LUE;

Further naming some of the regions within this category of ancient regions that had a founder nation selected to lead them, and subsequently were appointed by the gods themselves, to be Europe, 10000 Islands, Texas, The Heartland, Wysteria, Nasicournia, Space Sector RPRA, Hell, ISAF2, Subreality, Germany, Kattar, Katasia, USSR, Anarchy, and Axis of Absurdity.

Acknowledging that not all of the ancient regions having a founder appointed by the gods themselves can be listed within this resolution, and that out of all of the regions from this ancient period only approximately 15.5%, or slightly more but not all, still exist to this day;

Believing that these regions hold a significant position within the interregional community, as they are among the last of the first regions ever founded within NationStates, and that due to this status these regions should be considered as historical places within the Multiverse community;

Stating that these regions, whether they are Founderless now or lose their founders in the future, ought to be protected from subversion or attack to the best of the interregional communities ability by:

  • The writing of interregional protection treaties. All regions of defender, Independent, Imperialist and non-aligned ideologies can sign and adopt treaties to protect these regions from aggression by military forces.
  • The creation and passage of regional laws if they have a functioning government. These laws would deter the regional military forces from attacking these regions and keep them from destroying them by removing all native nations and refounding.
  • Taking a stance against any Liberation resolution that the native population has not given their permission to be passed on their behalf or passed by they themselves. It should be the interregional community's stance that the will of the native population is above all the most important when it comes to their regions future, and

Encourages regional governments to take up policies that will actively discourage the subversion or destruction of these historical regions such as political isolation of the offending region or entity as well as having their regional militaries, if one exists, intervene on behalf of the original native populations to free their region with their permission.
Note: Only votes from TNP WA nations and NPA personnel will be counted. If you do not meet these requirements, please add (non-WA) or something of that effect to your vote.
Voting Instructions:
  • Vote For if you want the Delegate to vote For the resolution.
  • Vote Against if you want the Delegate to vote Against the resolution.
  • Vote Abstain if you want the Delegate to abstain from voting on this resolution.
  • Vote Present if you are personally abstaining from this vote.
Detailed opinions with your vote are appreciated and encouraged!


ForAgainstAbstainPresent
0000
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Can I inquire as to why people who were for the previous version of the proposal are now against it?

Mainly asking Comfed because they were for the previous version.

Edit: After finally identifying the loophole, I've withdrawn the proposal and fixed it. I apologize for this inconvenience.
 
Last edited:
This has been withdrawn. Thread will be unlocked if this gets resubmitted again.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top