[GA - Accelerator] Reducing Microplastics

Westinor

Registered
TNP Nation
Westinor
Discord
Westinor#2315
ga.jpg

Reducing Microplastics
Accelerator Draft Discussion and Review

Category: All Businesses | Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Scalizagasti | Onsite Topic


The General Assembly,

Noting that microplastics can cause adverse health effects to organic life, both physically and chemically,

Concerned by the increasing prevalence of microplastics in water sources, the ground, food, and the atmosphere, especially considering the ability of said microplastics to remain in those environments for centuries,

Recognizing the purposeful and unnecessary inclusion of microplastics in many products, such as plastic microbeads in cosmetics,

Further recognizing that microplastics are released into the environment unintentionally through microfibre textiles, the breakdown of regular plastics, and more,

Desiring a targeted resolution to prevent the further proliferation of microplastics in the environment to protect health, safety, and the ecosystem alike,

Hereby:

Defines “microplastics” as plastics and plastic fragments smaller than 5 millimeters in diameter along the longest length of the particle, which cannot fully biodegrade in water,

Tasks the WA Scientific Programme (WASP) with

Collecting microplastic pollution data in the atmosphere and bodies of water outside of national borders,

Aggregating and analyzing microplastic pollution data using information gathered by and shared between both member states and WASP itself,

Research into the most effective measures that member states, non-governmental organizations, and individuals can take to reduce microplastic pollution,

Communicating these measures to both governments and other non-governmental organizations,

Coordinating further research into microplastic pollution with member states upon request,
Prohibits the manufacturing and sale of products that contain purposefully-added microplastic particles with an exception for

Medication and other medical products for use inside the body,

Plastic nurdles that will be turned into larger plastics during the manufacturing/production of plastics,
Mandates that member states:

Ensure that wastewater treatment plants include processes that are known to significantly reduce microplastic concentrations in water during operation based on WASP recommendations and their own internal research, such as membrane bioreactor treating and rapid sand filtering,

Implement the most effective measures to combat other known sources of microplastic runoff into the environment based on WASP recommendations and their own internal research, such as mandating filtration in laundry machines to reduce runoff from synthetic fibre clothing,

Track microplastic pollution within their borders to the best of their ability, sharing the gathered data with WASP and using it wherever possible to inform future policy decisions,

Organize educational campaigns and curricula reforms to inform their citizens of the prevalence of microplastics and ways in which individuals can alter consumer behaviour to reduce microplastic pollution,

Establish legal frameworks that plastic producers and manufacturers must follow to minimize accidental nurdle pollution, reduce the risk of nurdle spills, and mitigate the effects of spills when they do occur,
Urges member states to take additional steps to reduce the general consumption of non-biodegradable plastic through measures including, but not limited to:

Preventing wasteful plastic packaging (e.g. ‘double packaging’),

Eliminating single-use plastics where feasible,

Researching and developing plastics which can safely biodegrade in water without leaving toxic remains or turning into microplastics,

Promoting other biodegradable alternatives to plastic, and

Promoting and expanding the recycling of products which contain plastics in part or in whole.
Note: This is an internal discussion on a draft proposal accepted to the WA Accelerator Program. Please rip this draft apart and offer any comments you may have; the objective here is to help the author make this proposal better. If the author does not have access to this subforum, comments will be communicated to them by the Minister or an assigned Deputy. Detailed feedback is appreciated and encouraged!

Sponsorship Voting Instructions (Optional):
  • Vote Accept if you want the Ministry and Delegate to sponsor the proposal upon submission.
  • Vote Reject if you want the Ministry and Delegate to not sponsor the proposal upon submission.
Detailed opinions on whether to sponsor this proposal are likewise appreciated and encouraged!

Accept Reject
40
 
Last edited:
I am not sure why microplastics is the issue of concern when the proposal can be extended to plastics in general, and waste. While the idea is noble, I believe that policies these specific would cause lots of problems when we later implement more generic environment policy to deal with disposable waste, for instance. I am leaning reject tbh.
 
I am not sure why microplastics is the issue of concern when the proposal can be extended to plastics in general, and waste. While the idea is noble, I believe that policies these specific would cause lots of problems when we later implement more generic environment policy to deal with disposable waste, for instance. I am leaning reject tbh.
From Scalizagasti:


I got a similar comment about plastics in general on the forums as well. basically, while microplastics and (macro)plastics are undoubtedly linked, they are also distinct in both mitigation methods and impact. For instance the health impacts of microplastics, which may be consumed by coral & plankton and which can accumulate in the food chain before human consumption, are pretty different from the health impacts of macroplastics. I felt that the issue of plastic waste was too broad to tackle at once, and that narrowing the scope of my resolution to solely microplastics would be more appropriate. Furthemore with a narrower scope I could go more in-depth with explanations (again tying back to the unique impacts of microplastics) as well as mitigation methods. As for more generic environmental policy in the future, I do not believe my resolution severely infringes upon that space. 3, 4(a), 4(b), and 4(e) both deal with microplastics specifically rather than plastic generally. 4(d) is educational campaigns/curricula reform which again still leaves space for broader waste legislation. I could see section 5 as possibly infringing upon that space, but 5 is purposefully both semi-vague and non-binding (it only "urges") so that future legislation on macroplastics and general waste would not be constrained.

tl;dr microplastics and macroplastics have unique impacts and reduction strategies so separate resolutions are more appropriate to deal with these two issues. furthermore the resolution is specific enough at parts and open enough at others to ensure future resolutions aren't constrained by this one.
 
tl;dr microplastics and macroplastics have unique impacts and reduction strategies so separate resolutions are more appropriate to deal with these two issues. furthermore the resolution is specific enough at parts and open enough at others to ensure future resolutions aren't constrained by this one.
I get where he is coming from, but I think I need to think a bit more about it.
 
Back
Top