[SC - IN QUEUE] Condemn The Black Hawks

Status
Not open for further replies.

Greater Cesnica

Resident
-
TNP Nation
Greater Nabeul
Discord
novemberstars#8888
ga.jpg

Condemn The Black Hawks
Category: Condemnation | Target: The Black Hawks
Proposed by: Frontier Isles | No onsite topic​


The Security Council,

Acknowledging that The Black Hawks have been condemned twice by resolution SC #52 and resolution SC #217.

Noting that The Black Hawks have continued to carry out raids on other regions since the passage of resolution SC #217, and asserting that a third condemnation is needed to emphasize the constant threat that The Black Hawks pose to "interregional peace and goodwill".

Further noting that The Black Hawks have established 234 embassies with other regions; many of these regions were raided by The Black Hawks, and some of these raided regions are still controlled, or "colonized", by The Black Hawks, such as Westphalia, which has been controlled by The Black Hawks for nearly two years.

Horrified that The Black Hawks participated in the recent invasion of The Embassy, a neutral region that held 3519 embassies; the World Factbook entry of The Embassy became an advertising space for The Black Hawks and its allies following the invasion. Further shocked that the invaders dismissed the officers in The Embassy, and the invaders ordered all 3519 embassies to be shut down.

Recognizing that recently, The Black Hawks and Lily "look towards a bright future" between them and their militaries, indicating that The Black Hawks are now allied with another "invader" region.

Restating that, to emphasize the threat that The Black Hawks pose to "interregional security and goodwill", it is necessary for the Security Council to use force and condemn The Black Hawks because the purpose of the Security Council is to "[spread] interregional peace and goodwill, via force if necessary".

Hereby condemns The Black Hawks.
Note: Only votes from TNP WA nations and NPA personnel will be counted. If you do not meet these requirements, please add (non-WA) or something of that effect to your vote.
Voting Instructions:
  • Vote For if you want the Delegate to vote For the resolution.
  • Vote Against if you want the Delegate to vote Against the resolution.
  • Vote Abstain if you want the Delegate to abstain from voting on this resolution.
  • Vote Present if you are personally abstaining from this vote.
Detailed opinions with your vote are appreciated and encouraged!

[TR][TD] For [/TD][TD] Against [/TD][TD] Abstain [/TD][TD] Present [/TD][/TR][TR][TD]2[/TD][TD]15[/TD][TD]0[/TD][TD]2[/TD][/TR]
 
Last edited:
1. This resolution is wholly unconvincing, and
2. Lily isn’t an invader region.
Against.
 
Against

Clearly, two condemnations haven't stopped them. It also seems like a badge of honor for a region to be condemned 3 times.
Well yes, that’s what a condemn is meant to do. It’s not supposed to stop them, it’s honoring their work as a “villain”
So what's next then? Four condemnations? People need to stop rewarding regions like TBH by giving them badges.
Stop rewarding raider regions with badges meant to reward them for the things they’ve done?
 
For

As we all known, the black hawks are the most evil players of Nation States, they seem to exist solely to destroy region, and I really don't get what is the fun in that.
We will never say it often, the Black Hawks are terrible threat to Peace, they must be condemned as often as possible.
 
Last edited:
As of 12:04 PM EST, this proposal has achieved the necessary approvals to make quorum. This proposal, assuming it is not pulled beforehand, will take the floor at Major Update on Thursday, March 4 following Repeal: "Liberate The Embassy".
 
Are there more random delegates approving such proposals? Because I can't see why this proposal should end up on the voting floor anyways. TBH has been condemned twice, the proposal doesn't provide any substantial arguments on why they need a third. The only valid argument is the first one. The second one sounds like an argument so generic that it can be applied to a number of other organisations (who never got one condemn), the alliance with Lily doesn't justify anything, the participation in The Embassy's raid is just 1 raid.

For the sake of showcasing what is a condemn and commend, we need to write more proposals demonstrate to these newbies. Against.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top