Freedomanica
Registered
General Assembly Resolution #491 “Rights of the employed” (Category: Civil Rights; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.
Noting that despite being written with the commendable goal of fighting workplace discrimination, "Rights of the Employed" is marred by several glaring issues which leave it unable to achieve its lofty goals. Though ostensibly intended to ensure "a range of rights" for workers, the proposal inexplicably omits freelance workers and most contractors from benefiting under its clauses. Many nations finds it troubling that the first thing a resolution against workplace discrimination does is differentiate against specific types of laborers;
Further noting moreover, some of the proposal's language is risky at best. For example, the legislation places the burden on the laborer to verify to the employer the need for breastfeeding at work, which is unsuitable for what should be obvious explanations;
Realizing on the subject of breastfeeding, the proposal mandates that "a private, safe, hygienic and ventilated area in [the] workplace, separate from any toilets" exists entirely for breastfeeding, which is unrealistic for many small jobs. Furthermore, the proposal's heavy-handed banning of "intimidating behavior" is solely incompatible with certain careers built around experiencing such;
Thus hereby repeals ”Rights of The Employed”.
Noting that despite being written with the commendable goal of fighting workplace discrimination, "Rights of the Employed" is marred by several glaring issues which leave it unable to achieve its lofty goals. Though ostensibly intended to ensure "a range of rights" for workers, the proposal inexplicably omits freelance workers and most contractors from benefiting under its clauses. Many nations finds it troubling that the first thing a resolution against workplace discrimination does is differentiate against specific types of laborers;
Further noting moreover, some of the proposal's language is risky at best. For example, the legislation places the burden on the laborer to verify to the employer the need for breastfeeding at work, which is unsuitable for what should be obvious explanations;
Realizing on the subject of breastfeeding, the proposal mandates that "a private, safe, hygienic and ventilated area in [the] workplace, separate from any toilets" exists entirely for breastfeeding, which is unrealistic for many small jobs. Furthermore, the proposal's heavy-handed banning of "intimidating behavior" is solely incompatible with certain careers built around experiencing such;
Thus hereby repeals ”Rights of The Employed”.
