[Complete][Completed] Repeal "Liberate Eternal Scholars"

[Sil Dorsett]

Category: Repeal
Resolution: SC#203
Proposed By: Tim Stark
Onsite Topic

Security Council Resolution #203 “Liberate Eternal Scholars” shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

ACKNOWLEDGING that the Liberation of Eternal Scholars was necessary at the time of its passing,

ASSERTING that SC #203 was successful in preventing the occupying Nazi forces from making Eternal Scholars their trophy,

NOTING however, that the native population of Eternal Scholars has decided to relocate to a more secure region, The Eternal Scholars,

ACKNOWLEDGING the wish of the native population to preserve their history in Eternal Scholars,

RESOLVING to enable the native population of Eternal Scholars to preserve their legacy by protecting the region through border control measures,

THE WA SECURITY COUNCIL

hereby REPEALS SC #203 "Liberate Eternal Scholars".

Please vote For, Against, Abstain, or Present. Detailed opinions with your vote are appreciated and encouraged!

Spoiler: Regional Vote

[wavote=the_north_pacific,sc]2017_02_09_repeal_liberate_eternal_scholars[/wavote]

Spoiler: World Vote

[wavote=world,sc]2017_02_09_repeal_liberate_eternal_scholars[/wavote]

 

[Sil Dorsett]

The liberation of Eternal Scholars was done to prevent Nazi forces from locking the region, and would already be repealed were it not for interference from another raider group. With the Nazis and raiders both long gone, Eternal Scholars is once again ready for the liberation to end. Although the natives have already decided to move on to a new secure region called "The Eternal Scholars," to preserve their history and legacy they wish to have the original region locked before moving. With the attention Eternal Scholars has from defender forces after being seized by raiders during the last liberation repeal attempt, we are confident that the current delegate will not be overthrown.

For these reasons, the Ministry of World Assembly Affairs recommends a vote for the resolution.

 

[Darcania]

For

 

[Mall]

You copied the original resolution up there. This is a repeal of that resolution.

 

[Sil Dorsett]

Good catch! Fixed.

 

[Kaschovia]

For

 

[Teesea]

For

 

[Cerian Quilor]

I'm temperamentally included to take a 'you wanted it, live with it' approach to liberations, as a general rule.

Against

 

[Scorch]

For

 

[Mystery Player]

This is still up?

For

 

[Mall]

Against.

Let the raiders destroy it and refound it.

 

[Antonius Kaizuniviel]

For

 

[Mystery Player]

Against.

Let the raiders destroy it and refound it.

Why?

I'm temperamentally included to take a 'you wanted it, live with it' approach to liberations, as a general rule.

Against

Never knew that mindset existed, because whats the point of it? The point of a liberation is to protect a region. Leaving an unnecessary liberation does the exact opposite.

 

[Mall]

Against.

Let the raiders destroy it and refound it.

Why?

I'm temperamentally included to take a 'you wanted it, live with it' approach to liberations, as a general rule.

Against

Never knew that mindset existed, because whats the point of it? The point of a liberation is to protect a region. Leaving an unnecessary liberation does the exact opposite.

The point of a Liberation proposal is to remove a Delegate imposed password and prevent future Delegates from imposing one while it remains in place. Nothing more, nothing less. Any other meaning that you believe it possesses is a mere contrivance. The nations which formerly resided there have fled, they don't deserve to keep the trophy. Let it go to those with the power to take it.

 

[Yalkan]

For.

 

[Tomb]

For.

 

[Mystery Player]

Against.

Let the raiders destroy it and refound it.

Why?

I'm temperamentally included to take a 'you wanted it, live with it' approach to liberations, as a general rule.

Against

Never knew that mindset existed, because whats the point of it? The point of a liberation is to protect a region. Leaving an unnecessary liberation does the exact opposite.

The point of a Liberation proposal is to remove a Delegate imposed password and prevent future Delegates from imposing one while it remains in place. Nothing more, nothing less. Any other meaning that you believe it possesses is a mere contrivance. The nations which formerly resided there have fled, they don't deserve to keep the trophy. Let it go to those with the power to take it.

Why did they added the ability to do that? To prevent delegate-imposed passwords?

 

[artiza]

Abstain

 

[Cerian Quilor]

Against.

Let the raiders destroy it and refound it.

Why?

I'm temperamentally included to take a 'you wanted it, live with it' approach to liberations, as a general rule.

Against

Never knew that mindset existed, because whats the point of it? The point of a liberation is to protect a region. Leaving an unnecessary liberation does the exact opposite.

The point of a Liberation proposal is to remove a Delegate imposed password and prevent future Delegates from imposing one while it remains in place. Nothing more, nothing less. Any other meaning that you believe it possesses is a mere contrivance. The nations which formerly resided there have fled, they don't deserve to keep the trophy. Let it go to those with the power to take it.

Why did they added the ability to do that? To prevent delegate-imposed passwords?

So it could be used.

My view is that liberations should be used sparingly, and honestly, they're overused by the WASC at the moment, so anyone who gets one should be stuck with it until the WA gets into the habit of not over using them.

 

[Frattastan]

Let it go to those with the power to take it.

Good. That would be me right now.

 

[Eyes that do not Lie]

For

 

[Mall]

Let it go to those with the power to take it.

Good. That would be me right now.

And if the Liberation stays in place Frattles? How long will you stay before you move on? Or will you risk a Liberated refound?

 

[Mystery Player]

Against.

Let the raiders destroy it and refound it.

Why?

I'm temperamentally included to take a 'you wanted it, live with it' approach to liberations, as a general rule.

Against

Never knew that mindset existed, because whats the point of it? The point of a liberation is to protect a region. Leaving an unnecessary liberation does the exact opposite.

The point of a Liberation proposal is to remove a Delegate imposed password and prevent future Delegates from imposing one while it remains in place. Nothing more, nothing less. Any other meaning that you believe it possesses is a mere contrivance. The nations which formerly resided there have fled, they don't deserve to keep the trophy. Let it go to those with the power to take it.

Why did they added the ability to do that? To prevent delegate-imposed passwords?

So it could be used.

My view is that liberations should be used sparingly, and honestly, they're overused by the WASC at the moment, so anyone who gets one should be stuck with it until the WA gets into the habit of not over using them.

But there is no reason to do that it seems.

 

[Sil Dorsett]

Voting on this resolution has ended.

Thanks to those nations who cast their votes. Your participation is a great help to the region.

This topic has been locked and sent to the Archives for safekeeping. If you would like this topic to be re-opened for further discussion, please contact the WA Delegate, a Global Moderator, or an Administrator for assistance. Thank you.