Roman for Vice Delegate

Romanoffia

Garde à l'eau!
Roman here, running for Vice Delegate.

I've held every elected position there is to have in TNP except Vice Delegate and Delegate. I'm 3# in the line of succession in the Security Council. I've been in the The North Pacific exclusively (in various incarnations/nations) since there was The North Pacific, which essentially makes me the only person standing for this office to have been in TNP exclusively. I have on loyalty in NationStates and that is to The North Pacific.

Why am I running for Vice Delegate?

I want to take a more technical approach to my service to the region and attempt to do so using an apolitical fashion. That means approaching the job largely from a more technical approach, and staying out of the political aspects as far as possible.

And that's about it.
 
So how can you claim there is an oligarchy, since you yourself fulfill every category for being part of the Oligarchy?
 
Scandigrad:
So how can you claim there is an oligarchy, since you yourself fulfill every category for being part of the Oligarchy?
The Oligarchy thing is a joke. It's largely meant as sarcasm. But there is an element of truth to it, but it's a moot point and nothing worth the effort to explain.

But largely, the "Oligarchy" thing is just a running joke that gets a good laugh (at least from my point of view) because it gets some people's knickers in a twist much to the amusement of many. :P
 
Suppose there is a nation founded which immediately joins the WA and endorses every WA nation in TNP, rising to 100 endorsements within a few hours.

What would you, as Vice Delegate, do?
 
Given your long-time involvement in the SC, how has security needs of TNP changed over time, and what changes do you forsee in the future (short- and long-term)

Will there be any instance where your work as a VD cross the 'apolitical' boundaries that you set for yourself?
 
Romanoffia:
Scandigrad:
So how can you claim there is an oligarchy, since you yourself fulfill every category for being part of the Oligarchy?
The Oligarchy thing is a joke. It's largely meant as sarcasm. But there is an element of truth to it, but it's a moot point and nothing worth the effort to explain.

But largely, the "Oligarchy" thing is just a running joke that gets a good laugh (at least from my point of view) because it gets some people's knickers in a twist much to the amusement of many. :P
And yet people believe what you say and roll with it, often hurting their own credibility. Have you considered throwing these people a bone to help them not make a fool of themselves, or is that all part of the fun?
 
Eluvatar:
Suppose there is a nation founded which immediately joins the WA and endorses every WA nation in TNP, rising to 100 endorsements within a few hours.

What would you, as Vice Delegate, do?

The first thing I would do is to inform the Delegate and the SC, and send the endo-tarting nation a polite game-side TG inviting them to join the forum, and informing them of the regulations we have in place concerning endorsement levels. If the keep at it and get close to exceeding the endorsement cap, have not responded to my first TG, I warn them that they risk being ejected from the region for violating the endo-cap and notify the Delegate and the SC of the TG. Should they violate the endo-cap, I would request the Delegate eject them or take other appropriate actions.

The idea is to have all the appropriate members of government well informed so that the proper procedures are followed in a prompt fashion as required.


Lord Nwahs:
Given your long-time involvement in the SC, how has security needs of TNP changed over time, and what changes do you forsee in the future (short- and long-term)

Will there be any instance where your work as a VD cross the 'apolitical' boundaries that you set for yourself?

As far as regional security needs, we need to make sure that we have complete understanding of the relevant game. We should also be studying the various exploits that others may attempt against out region.

On the 'apolitical' issue. When I say 'apolitical' I mean keeping an approach that doesn't play into the political interests of one person or faction, or at least play up to them. In other words, my approach will avoid entanglements involving competing personal interests that may be in conflict with the best interests of the region.

In short, I want to perform the job of Vice Delegate without making it 'political' in terms of satisfying anyone's personal ambitions that do no serve the best interests of the region or the government.

Now, as for crossing the 'apolitical line', I would resist any an all attempts to disrupt government conducted by people who simply seek power for their own personal aggrandisement or who would attempt to act in an unethical or immoral fashion, or any action which would tend to weaken the government or weaken individual rights or liberties.



plembobria:
As vice delegate, how will you promote cheese in the region?

I think the institution of an unnoffical and voluntary program involving a festival celebrating the virtues of producing, distributing and consuming of fermented dairy products would be in order. We could offer rewards and assorted decorations to honour those who have accomplished selfless acts of cheesy personal sacrifice which promote the rights and liberties of the various micro organisms which toil endlessly to produce cheese. We need to honour the 12 Labors of Cheese Producing Bacteria by repaying them for their efforts just before we consume them and the cheese with which they have become one. Did I mention that Lactobacillis is also responsible for Kimchee? Such overworked micro organisms should be recognised for their efforts.

I will however not extend these honours to such micro organisms like tinea pedis which is largely responsible for athlete's foot fungus, but they should also have the right to celebrate cheese (voluntarily, of course) if only for the reason they smell like cheese if left untreated. :cheese:


Scandigrad:
Romanoffia:
Scandigrad:
So how can you claim there is an oligarchy, since you yourself fulfill every category for being part of the Oligarchy?
The Oligarchy thing is a joke. It's largely meant as sarcasm. But there is an element of truth to it, but it's a moot point and nothing worth the effort to explain.

But largely, the "Oligarchy" thing is just a running joke that gets a good laugh (at least from my point of view) because it gets some people's knickers in a twist much to the amusement of many. :P
And yet people believe what you say and roll with it, often hurting their own credibility. Have you considered throwing these people a bone to help them not make a fool of themselves, or is that all part of the fun?

You don't actually believe that anyone believes in the existence of the "Oligarchy", do you? Does that answer your question you Fromage manger oligarchist? :cheese:
 
Romanoffia:
You don't actually believe that anyone believes in the existence of the "Oligarchy", do you?
Why don't you ask JhonsJoe, Syrixia, HuAt, or any of the other new players whose electability in TNP has been badly damaged by taking your "sarcastic joke with an element of truth" seriously?

Elected officials, and executive officials in particular, are powerful role models for new members of the community. As Vice Delegate, will you continue to take advantage of their inexperience by dupinng them into tanking their campaigns before they've had a chance to learn their way around?
 
Don't worry, SillyString. I just got nuclear weapons, and I think Roman just provided me with a good place to test them.

Jks, lol. Just kiddin'.





(Maybe.)
 
Lord Nwahs:
Poe's Law applies, even for Oligarchy-talk.

I think everyone here knows the difference between when I am being sincere and when I am engaging in parody. I cannot be responsible for the lack of a sense of humour on the part of a tiny minority of people who constantly look for ways to one-up or bash everyone else for political gain. (parody statement. Maybe.) :P

SillyString:
Romanoffia:
You don't actually believe that anyone believes in the existence of the "Oligarchy", do you?
Why don't you ask JhonsJoe, Syrixia, HuAt, or any of the other new players whose electability in TNP has been badly damaged by taking your "sarcastic joke with an element of truth" seriously?

Elected officials, and executive officials in particular, are powerful role models for new members of the community. As Vice Delegate, will you continue to take advantage of their inexperience by dupinng them into tanking their campaigns before they've had a chance to learn their way around?

Ah, once again I am privileged to be the target of yet another totally bogus accusation. (Sincere)

You're just mad that you weren't invited to last night's Oligarchy in The Park celebration (with open bar and free sandwiches). (Sarcastic)

Which means please don't waste my time with bogus stuff like this if you wish for me to actually respond to you at all. (Sincere).

With my sincere apologies to Mr. Nathan Poe.
 
Romanoffia:
Ah, once again I am privileged to be the target of yet another totally bogus accusation.
I'm acting astonished.

Crushing Our Enemies:
I really can't. I don't think I'm the only one.

Seconded

It's a real shame too, because if only these tasteless little antics were not as serious as they are made out to be, I'd actually consider voting for you. You're more than qualified, but the nature in which you carry yourself is what hurts you in the long run.
 
Crushing Our Enemies:
Romanoffia:
I think everyone here knows the difference between when I am being sincere and when I am engaging in parody.
I really can't. I don't think I'm the only one.

Now, do I go into your campaign thread and post trash?

No, because I am more honourable than that.



mcmasterdonia:
How would you rate your RMB activity over the past few months?

Would you expect this to improve if you were elected?


I've been on the RMB more actively in recent times, but not as much as I could be.

That said, if elected, I would be on the RMB and available there as much as possible, which would be a few hours per day according to when I am on my computer.
 
SillyString:
Scandigrad:
Crushing Our Enemies:
I really can't. I don't think I'm the only one.

Seconded
Count me in that group too.

The myriad statements veering between "it's all a joke" and "it's all true" don't make it any easier, either.
Why do you always insist on trying to trash my campaign threads and drag them off topic with personal attacks?

Enquiring minds want to know.
 
A campaign thread is meant for questions for the candidate, is it not? I think COE, Scandigrad, and SillyString are just asking a legitimate question of you. So I will ask because I am quite confused by you Roman. Is the oligarchy thing a joke to you or not?
 
Malvad:
A campaign thread is meant for questions for the candidate, is it not? I think COE, Scandigrad, and SillyString are just asking a legitimate question of you. So I will ask because I am quite confused by you Roman. Is the oligarchy thing a joke to you or not?
I haven't had but a few legitimate questions in my campaign thread. The rest are just to personally bash.

Is the oligarchy real? Whether or not intended, it is real. And the actions of a few people are proving it by their constant bashing.
 
If I may perhaps clarify what I have gleaned from Roman's statements on the matter. IC the Oligarchy is real. The character of Roman is rebelling against it. OOC the player is enjoying a joke.
 
Great Bights Mum:
If I may perhaps clarify what I have gleaned from Roman's statements on the matter. IC the Oligarchy is real. The character of Roman is rebelling against it. OOC the player is enjoying a joke.
Huh. I've always taken TNP politics on an OOC standpoint.
 
If that is the case, perhaps Roman should make use of IC and OOC tags when referencing the Oligarchy. That would go a long way towards clearing up confusion. It would also be helpful if he indicated whether he was speaking IC, OOC, or both at different times in this thread.
 
Great Bights Mum:
If I may perhaps clarify what I have gleaned from Roman's statements on the matter. IC the Oligarchy is real. The character of Roman is rebelling against it. OOC the player is enjoying a joke.

That might approximate the situation to a certain degree.

The OOC me is always enjoying a good joke. The IC me isn't laughing.

Crushing Our Enemies:
If that is the case, perhaps Roman should make use of IC and OOC tags when referencing the Oligarchy. That would go a long way towards clearing up confusion. It would also be helpful if he indicated whether he was speaking IC, OOC, or both at different times in this thread.

I shall now use and OOC tag to avoid confusing COE any more that COE already is...

[OOC]

You mean you can't tell the difference between IC/OOC and what is not real and what is real? Then there is no hope for you but to sequester yourself in the Official State Religion Monastery and contemplate your navel while sussing out the deeper meaning of life, the universe and everything, especially the divine nature of cheese.

This video will explain it all to you in terms you can completely understand:

[flash]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTwnwbG9YLE[/flash]


Now, can you tell the difference or must I simplify it even more?

But seriously, you really need to lay off on your nasty approach when dealing with me because confusing you is becoming too easy. And I don't want your head to explode figuring out the difference.

GBM gets it, why can't you? :P

[/OOC]
 
Crushing Our Enemies:
I understand the difference between in-character and out-of-character. Please stop insulting me.

I'm not insulting you, I am just pointing out the fact of your statement in which you seem confused as to what is IC or OOC.

flemingovia:
Snark wins few votes.

Probably not, but vicious, personal ad-hom attacks seem to win every time around here. :P
 
Back
Top