[Complete][SC] At Vote: Condemn North Korea

r3naissanc3r

r3naissanc3r

TNPer
-
-
Condemn North Korea

Category: Condemnation | Nominee: North Korea | Proposed by: Republic of Minerva | Resolution link | World Assembly forum thread​
Description: The Security Council,

UNDERSTANDING that North Korea is a region dedicated to the principles of "Anti-Imperialism, Anti-Colonialism, [and] Self Determination,"

NOTING that North Korea denies the freedom of speech of their members, as shown by Article 8d of their constitution, as well as banning any nation they deem to be "reactionary" from their region,

ACKNOWLEDGING North Korea's position of anti-fascism, and it's attempt to combat fascism has turned it into a large empire spanning almost a thousand regions indirectly connected to it, blocking others from using those region's name merely in the name of "anti-fascism,"

RECALLING a North Korean backed raid of the region Benevolent Capitalism, a small region whose only guilt was being associated to other regions indirectly, and was unfairly raided a second time after it was noted that the Black Riders had done one before them, despite said region not being fascist in the least,

AWARE of North Korea's recent refounding of Slavya, a long time regional community that once had up to 150 nations, had denied that region's previous founder a chance to refound the region, securing it under their control,

APPALLED that North Korea's sole motivation in keeping Slavya is due to their belief that freedom of speech and association shouldn't apply to Slavyans, and that their ideas of what freedom is must be imposed on other regions under the guise of anti-fascism,

BELIEVING that by occupying Slavya, and by invading other regions in the name of "Anti-Imperialism, Anti-Colonialism, [and] Self-Determination," North Korea violates the principles that they claim they are dedicated to, and poses a threat to the international community,

Hereby CONDEMNS North Korea.
Please vote: For | Against | Abstain | Present

"Abstain" means that you wish for the Delegate to not vote on the resolution at all.
"Present" means that you effectively choose not to participate in this vote. "Present" has no effect on how the Delegate votes.

Posts which do not include an explicit and unambiguous vote are not counted in the tally.
 
Ministry vote recommendation: Against

Ministry Review
Written by HMS Unicorn

This is another in a series of poor resolutions to reach quorum in the Security Council. The resolution is badly written, in terms of both content and style. The author themselves have acknowledged that this is a rather poor draft and that they should not have submitted it, though unfortunately they did not request to have it removed from the queue in time.

The region nominated for a condemnation has done very little to warrant any attention, let alone a full condemnation by the WA. The main bullet point in the list of "condemnable" actions is the refounding of the region Slavya. While unwarranted refounding is generally condemnable, a single instance of this action hardly makes a region worth a condemnation - otherwise, we would be condemning hundreds of regions.

For these reasons, we recommend a vote against this resolution.
 
This one is 3 approvals away of making quorum. Since the SC queue is empty, it'll likely go to vote next minor update.

That's an easy one. The resolution is badly written, in terms of both content and style. The author themselves have acknowledged that this is a rather poor draft and that they should not have submitted it. Why they did not file a GHR to have it pulled from the queue is beyond me.

Against.
 
Against. What reasons would people have to vote for it? Or are they just doing it to troll?
 
Voting on this resolution has ended.

Thanks to those nations who cast their votes. Your participation is a great help to the region.

This topic has been locked and sent to the Archives for safekeeping. If you would like this topic to be re-opened for further discussion, please contact the WA Delegate, a Global Moderator, or an Administrator for assistance. Thank you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top